Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Gkountouras

dblp:344/6018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.912025
Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
causal world model
0.912025
Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › language-based planning
LLM-based planning
0.912025
Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9causal representation learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown great promise in planning and reasoning applications. These tasks demand robust systems, which arguably require a causal understanding of the environment. While LLMs can acquire and reflect common sense causal knowledge from their pretraining data, this information is often incomplete, incorrect, or inapplicable to a specific environment. In contrast, causal representation learning (CRL) focuses on identifying the underlying causal structure within a given environment. We propose a framework that integrates CRLs with LLMs to enable causally-aware reasoning and planning. This framework learns a causal world model, with causal variables linked to natural language expressions. This mapping provides LLMs with a flexible interface to process and generate descriptions of actions and states in text form. Effectively, the causal world model acts as a simulator that the LLM can query and interact with. We evaluate the framework on causal inference and planning tasks across temporal scales and environmental complexities. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, with the causally-aware method outperforming LLM-based reasoners, especially for longer planning horizons.
John Gkountouras, Matthias Lindemann, Phillip Lippe, Efstratios Gavves, Ivan Titov 0001
ICLR1