Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yida Lu

dblp:344/6179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-4492-9047ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Vision and language · 11%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
abusive language detection
1.012026
New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › machine-generated text detection
LLM-based detection
1.012026
New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › generative model safety
multimodal large language model safety
1.012026
The Side Effects of Being Smart: Safety Risks in MLLMs' Multi-Image Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
1.012026
The Side Effects of Being Smart: Safety Risks in MLLMs' Multi-Image Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
VPO: Aligning Text-to-Video Generation Models with Prompt Optimization · ICCV 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.912025
SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-context language model
0.912025
LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning
0.912025
SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering
prompt optimization
0.912025
VPO: Aligning Text-to-Video Generation Models with Prompt Optimization · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation
0.912025
LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › video generation
text-to-video generation
0.912025
VPO: Aligning Text-to-Video Generation Models with Prompt Optimization · ICCV 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large vision-language model · 1.7deliberative cross-modal reasoning · 1.7preference learning · 1.7search-augmented LLM · 1.0multimodal reasoning evaluation · 1.0consensus-based detection · 1.0tree search · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.9self-play · 0.9reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The Side Effects of Being Smart: Safety Risks in MLLMs' Multi-Image Reasoning
abstract
Renmiao Chen, Yida Lu, Shiyao Cui, Xuan Ouyang, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Shumin Zhang, Chengwei Pan, Han Qiu, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Renmiao Chen, Yida Lu, Shiyao Cui, Xuan Ouyang, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Chengwei Pan, Han Qiu 0001, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)2
2026 New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs
abstract
Shiyao Cui, QingLin Zhang, Di Wang, Yida Lu, Zhexin Zhang, Jinhua Gao, Jinglin Yang, Min He, Han Qiu, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Shiyao Cui, Yida Lu, Zhexin Zhang, Jinhua Gao, Jinglin Yang, Han Qiu 0001, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)4
2025 LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models
abstract
Yida Lu, Jiale Cheng, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yida Lu, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)1
2025 VPO: Aligning Text-to-Video Generation Models with Prompt Optimization
abstract
Video generation models have achieved remarkable progress in text-to-video tasks. These models are typically trained on text-video pairs with highly detailed and carefully crafted descriptions, while real-world user inputs during inference are often concise, vague, or poorly structured. This gap makes prompt optimization crucial for generating high-quality videos. Current methods often rely on large language models (LLMs) to refine prompts through in-context learning, but suffer from several limitations: they may distort user intent, omit critical details, or introduce safety risks. Moreover, they optimize prompts without considering the impact on the final video quality, which can lead to suboptimal results. To address these issues, we introduce VPO, a principled framework that optimizes prompts based on three core principles: harmlessness, accuracy, and helpfulness. The generated prompts faithfully preserve user intents and, more importantly, enhance the safety and quality of generated videos. To achieve this, VPO employs a two-stage optimization approach. First, we construct and refine a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset based on principles of safety and alignment. Second, we introduce both text-level and video-level feedback to further optimize the SFT model with preference learning. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that VPO significantly improves safety, alignment, and video quality compared to baseline methods. Moreover, VPO shows strong generalization across video generation models. Furthermore, we demonstrate that VPO could outperform and be combined with RLHF methods on video generation models, underscoring the effectiveness of VPO in aligning video generation models. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/VPO.
Ruiliang Lyu, Xiaotao Gu, Xiao Liu 0036, Jiazheng Xu, Yida Lu, Jiayan Teng, Zhuoyi Yang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ICCV6
2025 SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models
abstract
Instruction-following is a fundamental capability of language models, requiring the model to recognize even the most subtle requirements in the instructions and accurately reflect them in its output. Such an ability is well-suited for and often optimized by preference learning. However, existing methods often directly sample multiple independent responses from the model when creating preference pairs. Such practice can introduce content variations irrelevant to whether the instruction is precisely followed (e.g., different expressions about the same semantic), interfering with the goal of teaching models to recognize the key differences that lead to improved instruction following. In light of this, we introduce SPaR, a self-play framework integrating tree-search self-refinement to yield valid and comparable preference pairs free from distractions. By playing against itself, an LLM employs a tree-search strategy to refine its previous responses with respect to the instruction while minimizing unnecessary variations. Our experiments show that a LLaMA3-8B model, trained over three iterations guided by SPaR, surpasses GPT-4-Turbo on the IFEval benchmark without losing general capabilities. Furthermore, SPaR demonstrates promising scalability, greatly enhancing models like GLM-4-9B and LLaMA3-70B. We also identify how inference scaling in tree search would impact model performance. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/SPaR.
Xiao Liu 0036, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Yida Lu, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ICLR5
2025 ShieldVLM: Safeguarding the Multimodal Implicit Toxicity via Deliberative Reasoning with LVLMs: ShieldVLM
abstract
Toxicity detection in multimodal text-image content faces growing challenges, especially with multimodal implicit toxicity, where each modality appears benign on its own but conveys hazard when combined. Multimodal implicit toxicity appears not only as formal statements in social platforms but also prompts that can lead to toxic dialogs from Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Despite the success in unimodal text or image moderation, toxicity detection for multimodal content, particularly the multimodal implicit toxicity, remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we comprehensively build a taxonomy for multimodal implicit toxicity (MMIT) and introduce an MMIT-dataset, comprising 2,100 multimodal statements and prompts across 7 risk categories (31 sub-categories) and 5 typical cross-modal correlation modes. To advance the detection of multimodal implicit toxicity, we build ShieldVLM, a model which identifies implicit toxicity in multimodal statements, prompts and dialogs via deliberative cross-modal reasoning. Experiments show that ShieldVLM outperforms existing strong baselines in detecting both implicit and explicit toxicity. The model and dataset will be publicly available to support future researches (Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive contents). Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive contents.
Shiyao Cui, Xuan Ouyang, Renmiao Chen, Zhexin Zhang, Yida Lu, Hongning Wang, Han Qiu 0001, Minlie Huang
ACM Multimedia6