Mohamed Amine Ketata

dblp:344/7733 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 77% Graph learning · 12% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 50% Database system architecture and tuning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 62% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 38%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.722025
Joint Relational Database Generation via Graph-Conditional Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Lift Your Molecules: Molecular Graph Generation in Latent Euclidean Space · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
3d molecule generation
0.912025
Lift Your Molecules: Molecular Graph Generation in Latent Euclidean Space · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › conditional diffusion model
graph-conditioned diffusion
0.912025
Joint Relational Database Generation via Graph-Conditional Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
molecular graph generation
0.912025
Lift Your Molecules: Molecular Graph Generation in Latent Euclidean Space · ICLR 2025
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
relational database generation
0.912025
Joint Relational Database Generation via Graph-Conditional Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Data integration and cleaning › data generation
synthetic data generation
0.912025
Joint Relational Database Generation via Graph-Conditional Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction
0.712023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry
0.212023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular force field
0.212023
Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 2.6graph neural network · 1.7gaussian process · 1.3evidential regression · 1.3dropout · 1.3inpainting · 0.9guidance · 0.9equivariant graph neural network · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lift Your Molecules: Molecular Graph Generation in Latent Euclidean Space
abstract
We introduce a new framework for 2D molecular graph generation using 3D molecule generative models. Our Synthetic Coordinate Embedding (SyCo) framework maps 2D molecular graphs to 3D Euclidean point clouds via synthetic coordinates and learns the inverse map using an E($n$)-Equivariant Graph Neural Network (EGNN). The induced point cloud-structured latent space is well-suited to apply existing 3D molecule generative models. This approach simplifies the graph generation problem into a point cloud generation problem followed by node and edge classification tasks, without relying on molecular fragments nor autoregressive decoding. Further, we propose a novel similarity-constrained optimization scheme for 3D diffusion models based on inpainting and guidance. As a concrete implementation of our framework, we develop EDM-SyCo based on the E(3) Equivariant Diffusion Model (EDM). EDM-SyCo achieves state-of-the-art performance in distribution learning of molecular graphs, outperforming the best non-autoregressive methods by more than 26\% on ZINC250K and 16\% on the GuacaMol dataset while improving conditional generation by up to 3.9 times.
Mohamed Amine Ketata, Nicholas Gao, Johanna Sommer, Tom Wollschläger, Stephan Günnemann
ICLR1
2025 Joint Relational Database Generation via Graph-Conditional Diffusion Models
abstract
Building generative models for relational databases (RDBs) is important for many applications, such as privacy-preserving data release and augmenting real datasets. However, most prior works either focus on single-table generation or adapt single-table models to the multi-table setting by relying on autoregressive factorizations and sequential generation. These approaches limit parallelism, restrict flexibility in downstream applications, and compound errors due to commonly made conditional independence assumptions. In this paper, we propose a fundamentally different approach: jointly modeling all tables in an RDB without imposing any table order. By using a natural graph representation of RDBs, we propose the Graph-Conditional Relational Diffusion Model (GRDM), which leverages a graph neural network to jointly denoise row attributes and capture complex inter-table dependencies. Extensive experiments on six real-world RDBs demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms autoregressive baselines in modeling multi-hop inter-table correlations and achieves state-of-the-art performance on single-table fidelity metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/ketatam/rdb-diffusion.
Mohamed Amine Ketata, David Lüdke, Leo Schwinn, Stephan Günnemann
NeurIPS1
2023 Uncertainty Estimation for Molecules: Desiderata and Methods
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are promising surrogates for quantum mechanical calculations as they establish unprecedented low errors on collections of molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories. Thanks to their fast inference times they promise to accelerate computational chemistry applications. Unfortunately, despite low in-distribution (ID) errors, such GNNs might be horribly wrong for out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. Uncertainty estimation (UE) may aid in such situations by communicating the model’s certainty about its prediction. Here, we take a closer look at the problem and identify six key desiderata for UE in molecular force fields, three ’physics-informed’ and three ’application-focused’ ones. To overview the field, we survey existing methods from the field of UE and analyze how they fit to the set desiderata. By our analysis, we conclude that none of the previous works satisfies all criteria. To fill this gap, we propose Localized Neural Kernel (LNK) a Gaussian Process (GP)-based extension to existing GNNs satisfying the desiderata. In our extensive experimental evaluation, we test four different UE with three different backbones across two datasets. In out-of-equilibrium detection, we find LNK yielding up to 2.5 and 2.1 times lower errors in terms of AUC-ROC score than dropout or evidential regression-based methods while maintaining high predictive performance.
Tom Wollschläger, Nicholas Gao, Bertrand Charpentier, Mohamed Amine Ketata, Stephan Günnemann
ICML4