Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rainy Sharma
dblp:345/1070
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 50% Systems and software security · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery › machine-learning-based vulnerability detection
deep learning-based vulnerability detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Science in Software Engineering: A Study on Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Science in Software Engineering: A Study on Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Empirical software engineering
replication and reproducibility |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Science in Software Engineering: A Study on Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematic literature review · 1.3empirical study · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Open Science in Software Engineering: A Study on Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability DetectionabstractOpen science is a practice that makes scientific research publicly accessible to anyone, hence is highly beneficial. Given the benefits, the software engineering (SE) community has been diligently advocating open science policies during peer reviews and publication processes. However, to this date, there has been few studies that look into the status and issues of open science in SE from a systematic perspective. In this paper, we set out to start filling this gap. Given the great breadth of SE in general, we constrained our scope to a particular topic area in SE as an example case. Recently, an increasing number of deep learning (DL) approaches have been explored in SE, includingDL-based software vulnerability detection, a popular, fast-growing topic that addresses an important problem in software security. We exhaustively searched the literature in this area and identified 55 relevant works that propose a DL-based vulnerability detection approach. This was then followed by comprehensively investigating the four integral aspects of open science:availability,executability,reproducibility, andreplicability. Among other findings, our study revealed that only a small percentage (25.5%) of the studied approaches provided publiclyavailabletools. Some of these available tools did not provide sufficient documentation and complete implementation, making them notexecutableor notreproducible. The uses of balanced or artificially generated datasets caused significantly overrated performance of the respective techniques, making most of them notreplicable. Based on our empirical results, we made actionable suggestions on improving the state of open science in each of the four aspects. We note that our results and recommendations on most of these aspects (availability,executability,reproducibility) are not tied to the nature of the chosen topic (DL-based vulnerability detection) hence are likely applicable to other SE topic areas. We also believe our results and recommendations onreplicabilityto be applicable to other DL-based topics in SE as they are not tied to (the particular application of DL in) detecting software vulnerabilities. Yu Nong, Rainy Sharma, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, Xiapu Luo, Haipeng Cai |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |