Dataset distillation (DD) aims to generate a compact synthetic dataset that enables efficient training of neural networks while maintaining performance comparable to that achieved with the original dataset. However, existing methods often suffer from two main limitations. They either rely on computationally intensive iterative optimization procedures or depend heavily on architecture-specific designs. These issues limit their practicality for large-scale datasets and hinder generalization across different model architectures. To overcome these challenges, recent research has explored the use of diffusion models as an architecture-agnostic approach to dataset distillation, offering improved scalability and generalization for large-scale datasets across diverse model architectures. While diffusion-based dataset distillation methods have shown considerable potential, several challenges remain. Notably, certain approaches exhibit a distributional mismatch between the pre-trained diffusion model and the target dataset, which can adversely affect the fidelity and representativeness of the generated samples. Others require substantial fine-tuning to achieve high fidelity, which negates the benefits of architectural flexibility. In this work, we propose a new diffusion-based dataset distillation framework that effectively preserves the characteristics of the original dataset without requiring any fine-tuning. Our method employs adaptive sampling and repulsion regularization to enhance both the fidelity and diversity of generated samples. As a result, the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art distillation methods across a wide range of datasets and model architectures.

Pruning is a highly effective method for reducing the size of neural networks with negligible impact on their average performance. However, recent studies have revealed that pruning actually amplifies the bias in the models, leading to decreased performance for underrepresented groups. To address this issue, we first analyze the impact of pruning on the confidence of each sample and introduce Accumulated Confidence (AC). AC is a proxy that facilitates the identification of bias-conflicting and bias-aligned samples without relying on group annotations. We then propose a debiasing algorithm, which is called DEbiasing Network through Pruning (DENP). DENP utilizes AC to mitigate bias within the network. Even without bias information, DENP exhibits remarkable debiasing performance on varying levels of sparsity, effectively mitigating the bias-exacerbating property of pruning and resulting in both sparse and debiased neural networks. Moreover, even when compared with state-of-the-art debiasing baselines under identical conditions, the DENP still achieves the best performance on multiple benchmark datasets, demonstrating its superior debiasing capabilities.

As the use of machine learning models has increased, numerous studies have aimed to enhance fairness. However, research on the intersection of fairness and explainability remains insufficient, leading to potential issues in gaining the trust of actual users. Here, we propose a novel module that constructs a fair latent space, enabling faithful explanation while ensuring fairness. The fair latent space is constructed by disentangling and redistributing labels and sensitive attributes, allowing the generation of counterfactual explanations for each type of information. Our module is attached to a pretrained generative model, transforming its biased latent space into a fair latent space. Additionally, since only the module needs to be trained, there are advantages in terms of time and cost savings, without the need to train the entire generative model. We validate the fair latent space with various fairness metrics and demonstrate that our approach can effectively provide explanations for biased decisions and assurances of fairness.

Despite their impressive generative capabilities, text-to-image diffusion models often memorize and replicate training data, prompting serious concerns over privacy and copyright. Recent work has attributed this memorization to an attraction basin—a region where applying classifier-free guidance (CFG) steers the denoising trajectory toward memorized outputs—and has proposed deferring CFG application until the denoising trajectory escapes this basin. However, such delays often result in non-memorized images that are poorly aligned with the input prompts, highlighting the need to promote earlier escape so that CFG can be applied sooner in the denoising process. In this work, we show that the initial noise sample plays a crucial role in determining when this escape occurs. We empirically observe that different initial samples lead to varying escape times. Building on this insight, we propose two mitigation strategies that adjust the initial noise—either collectively or individually—to find and utilize initial samples that encourage earlier basin escape. These approaches significantly reduce memorization while preserving image-text alignment.

Models trained with empirical risk minimization (ERM) are prone to be biased towards spurious correlations between target labels and bias attributes, which leads to poor performance on data groups lacking spurious correlations. It is particularly challenging to address this problem when access to bias labels is not permitted. To mitigate the effect of spurious correlations without bias labels, we first introduce a novel training objective designed to robustly enhance model performance across all data samples, irrespective of the presence of spurious correlations. From this objective, we then derive a debiasing method, Disagreement Probability based Resampling for debiasing (DPR), which does not require bias labels. DPR leverages the disagreement between the target label and the prediction of a biased model to identify bias-conflicting samples—those without spurious correlations—and upsamples them according to the disagreement probability. Empirical evaluations on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DPR achieves state-of-the-art performance over existing baselines that do not use bias labels. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical analysis that details how DPR reduces dependency on spurious correlations.