Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Hojel
dblp:345/1735
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 50% Distributed and cloud data management · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed and cloud data management
data lake |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak supervision · 1.3large language model · 1.3in-context learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data LakesabstractA long standing goal in the data management community is developing systems that input documents and output queryable tables without user effort. Given the sheer variety of potential documents, state-of-the art systems make simplifying assumptions and use domain specific training. In this work, we ask whether we can maintain generality by using the in-context learning abilities of large language models (LLMs). We propose and evaluate Evaporate, a prototype system powered by LLMs. We identify two strategies for implementing this system: prompt the LLM to directly extract values from documents or prompt the LLM to synthesize code that performs the extraction. Our evaluations show a cost-quality tradeoff between these two approaches. Code synthesis is cheap, but far less accurate than directly processing each document with the LLM. To improve quality while maintaining low cost, we propose an extended implementation, Evaporate-Code+, which achieves better quality than direct extraction. Our insight is to generate many candidate functions and ensemble their extractions using weak supervision. Evaporate-Code+ outperforms the state-of-the art systems using a sublinear pass over the documents with the LLM. This equates to a 110X reduction in the number of documents the LLM needs to process across our 16 real-world evaluation settings. Simran Arora, Brandon Yang, Sabri Eyuboglu, Avanika Narayan, Andrew Hojel, Immanuel Trummer, Christopher Ré |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |