Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Wei

dblp:345/7805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0190-0835ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 93% Robot manipulation · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › task and motion planning
contact scheduling
0.812024
Consensus Complementarity Control for Multicontact MPC · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
hybrid model predictive control
0.812024
Consensus Complementarity Control for Multicontact MPC · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.812024
Consensus Complementarity Control for Multicontact MPC · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics › contact dynamics
multicontact motion
0.812024
Consensus Complementarity Control for Multicontact MPC · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

consensus formulation · 0.8alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Empirical Analysis of Sim-and-Real Cotraining of Diffusion Policies For Planar Pushing from Pixels
abstract
Cotraining with demonstration data generated both in simulation and on real hardware has emerged as a promising recipe for scaling imitation learning in robotics. This work seeks to elucidate basic principles of this simand-real cotraining to inform simulation design, sim-and-real dataset creation, and policy training. Our experiments confirm that cotraining with simulated data can dramatically improve performance, especially when real data is limited. We show that these performance gains scale with additional simulated data up to a plateau; adding more real-world data increases this performance ceiling. The results also suggest that reducing physical domain gaps may be more impactful than visual fidelity for non-prehensile or contact-rich tasks. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that some visual gap can help cotraining – binary probes reveal that high-performing policies must learn to distinguish simulated domains from real. We conclude by investigating this nuance and mechanisms that facilitate positive transfer between sim-and-real. Focusing narrowly on the canonical task of planar pushing from pixels allows us to be thorough in our study. In total, our experiments span 50+ real-world policies (evaluated on 1000+ trials) and 250 simulated policies (evaluated on 50,000+ trials). Videos and code can be found at https://sim-and-real-cotraining.github.io/.
Adam Wei, Abhinav Agarwal, Boyuan Chen 0003, Rohan Bosworth, Nicholas Pfaff, Russ Tedrake
IROS1
2024 Consensus Complementarity Control for Multicontact MPC
abstract
We propose a hybrid model predictive control algorithm, consensus complementarity control, for systems that make and break contact with their environment. Many state-of-the-art controllers for tasks, which require initiating contact with the environment, such as locomotion and manipulation, require a priori mode schedules or are too computationally complex to run at real-time rates. We present a method based on the alternating direction method of multipliers that is capable of high-speed reasoning over potential contact events. Via a consensus formulation, our approach enables parallelization of the contact scheduling problem. We validate our results on five numerical examples, including four high-dimensional frictional contact problems, and a physical experimentation on an underactuated multicontact system. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a physical experiment accomplishing a high-dimensional, multicontact manipulation task with a robot arm.
Alp Aydinoglu, Adam Wei, Michael Posa
IEEE Trans. Robotics2