VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yongbo Huang
dblp:345/9044
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-6754-6176ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical analysis · 1.0adaptive reasoning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational CapabilitiesabstractRecent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1/o3 and DeepSeek-R1, have demonstrated remarkable performance in specialized reasoning tasks through human-like deliberative thinking and long chain-of-thought reasoning. However, our systematic evaluation across various model families (DeepSeek, Qwen, and LLaMA) and scales (7B to 32B) reveals that acquiring these deliberative reasoning capabilities significantly reduces the foundational capabilities of LRMs, including notable declines in helpfulness and harmlessness, alongside substantially increased inference costs. Importantly, we demonstrate that adaptive reasoning---employing modes like Zero-Thinking, Less-Thinking, and Summary-Thinking---can effectively alleviate these drawbacks. Our empirical insights underline the critical need for developing more versatile LRMs capable of dynamically allocating inference-time compute according to specific task characteristics. Weixiang Zhao, Xingyu Sui, Jiahe Guo, Yulin Hu, Yang Deng 0002, Xuda Zhi, Yongbo Huang, Wanxiang Che, Ting Liu 0001, Bing Qin 0001 |
AAAI | 8 |
| 2026 | When Personalization Legitimizes Risks: Uncovering Safety Vulnerabilities in Personalized Dialogue AgentsabstractJiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Yulin Hu, Zimo Long, Xingyu Sui, Xuda Zhi, Yongbo Huang, Hao He, Weixiang Zhao, Yanyan Zhao, Bing Qin. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Jiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Yulin Hu, Zimo Long, Xingyu Sui, Xuda Zhi, Yongbo Huang, Weixiang Zhao, Bing Qin 0001 |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2023 | Remote Sensing Object Counting Through Regression Ensembles and Learning to RankabstractRemote sensing object counting is finding applications in many fields. Global regression is a long-ignored method for object counting, though it needs much less manual annotations than the alternatives. This work revisits global regression and improves it in two ways—one way is by replacing one single regressor with a deep ensemble, the other is by breaking down global regression into two easier and smaller problems: learning to rank (L2R) and linear transformation. To this end, we make a PAC-Bayesian analysis of regression ensembles and give an upper bound for their generalization error, offering new theoretical insight into ensemble learning. We also adapt a ranking metric optimization scheme to suit object counting, elegantly handling the L2R problem with gradient descent. What is more, based on our theoretical perspective, we provide a novel way of building deep regression ensembles, on which the ambiguity constraint is imposed. Then, by incorporating L2R into a deep ensemble, we propose a new counting model called the “ensemble of first-rank-then-estimate networks (eFreeNet).” Our extensive evaluation on six benchmarks shows that eFreeNet exhibits compelling performance across the board while being more annotation-efficient than other methods. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/huangyongbobo/eFreeNet. Yongbo Huang, Yuanpei Jin, Liqiang Zhang 0011, Yishu Liu 0004 |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 1 |