Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ridwanul Hasan Tanvir

dblp:346/0765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-1931-1469ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Network security · 100%
Computer networks
2 papers
Cellular and mobile networks · 85% Wireless networking · 15%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
1.012026
Guardians of the Air: In-Device Detection of 5G Control-Plane Threats · SP 2026
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
1.012026
Guardians of the Air: In-Device Detection of 5G Control-Plane Threats · SP 2026
Network security › protocol security
protocol vulnerability discovery
0.812024
State Machine Mutation-based Testing Framework for Wireless Communication Protocols · CCS 2024
Cellular and mobile networks › cellular network security
radio access network security
0.312026
Guardians of the Air: In-Device Detection of 5G Control-Plane Threats · SP 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state machine mutation · 1.5property-guided testing · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Guardians of the Air: In-Device Detection of 5G Control-Plane Threats
Tianwei Wu, Abdullah Al Ishtiaq, Tianchang Yang, Yilu Dong, Kai Tu, Ridwanul Hasan Tanvir, Md. Toufikuzzaman, Shagufta Mehnaz, Syed Rafiul Hussain
SP7
2024 State Machine Mutation-based Testing Framework for Wireless Communication Protocols
abstract
This paper proposes Proteus, a protocol state machine, property-guided, and budget-aware automated testing approach for discovering logical vulnerabilities in wireless protocol implementations. Proteus maintains its budget awareness by generating test cases (i.e., each being a sequence of protocol messages) that are not only meaningful (i.e., the test case mostly follows the desirable protocol flow except for some controlled deviations) but also have a high probability of violating the desirable properties. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we evaluated Proteus in two different protocol implementations, namely 4G LTE and BLE, across 23 consumer devices (11 for 4G LTE and 12 for BLE). Proteus discovered 25 unique issues, including 112 instances. Affected vendors have positively acknowledged 14 vulnerabilities through 5 CVEs.
Syed Md. Mukit Rashid, Tianwei Wu, Kai Tu, Abdullah Al Ishtiaq, Ridwanul Hasan Tanvir, Yilu Dong, Omar Chowdhury, Syed Rafiul Hussain
CCS5
2024 Using Large Language Models to Generate JUnit Tests: An Empirical Study
abstract
A code generation model generates code by taking a prompt from a code comment, existing code, or a combination of both. Although code generation models (e.g., GitHub Copilot) are increasingly being adopted in practice, it is unclear whether they can successfully be used for unit test generation without fine-tuning for a strongly typed language like Java. To fill this gap, we investigated how well three models (Codex, GPT-3.5-Turbo, and StarCoder) can generate unit tests. We used two benchmarks (HumanEval and Evosuite SF110) to investigate the effect of context generation on the unit test generation process. We evaluated the models based on compilation rates, test correctness, test coverage, and test smells. We found that the Codex model achieved above 80% coverage for the HumanEval dataset, but no model had more than 2% coverage for the EvoSuite SF110 benchmark. The generated tests also suffered from test smells, such as Duplicated Asserts and Empty Tests.
Mohammed Latif Siddiq, Joanna C. S. Santos, Ridwanul Hasan Tanvir, Noshin Ulfat, Fahmid Al Rifat, Vinicius Carvalho Lopes
EASE3