Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haixu Ma

dblp:346/0875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Learning theory · 40%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
individualized treatment rule
1.222023
Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments: A Supervised Clustering Approach Using Adaptive Fusion · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.822023
Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments: A Supervised Clustering Approach Using Adaptive Fusion · NeurIPS 2022
Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.712023
Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification
0.712023
Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

outcome weighted learning · 0.7angle-based multicategory SVM · 0.7supervised clustering · 0.6group lasso · 0.6convex optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments
abstract
Data driven individualized decision making problems have received a lot of attentions in recent years. In particular, decision makers aim to determine the optimal Individualized Treatment Rule (ITR) so that the expected specified outcome averaging over heterogeneous patient-specific characteristics is maximized. Many existing methods deal with binary or a moderate number of treatment arms and may not take potential treatment effect structure into account. However, the effectiveness of these methods may deteriorate when the number of treatment arms becomes large. In this article, we propose GRoup Outcome Weighted Learning (GROWL) to estimate the latent structure in the treatment space and the optimal group-structured ITRs through a single optimization. In particular, for estimating group-structured ITRs, we utilize the Reinforced Angle based Multicategory Support Vector Machines (RAMSVM) to learn group-based decision rules under the weighted angle based multi-class classification framework. Fisher consistency, the excess risk bound, and the convergence rate of the value function are established to provide a theoretical guarantee for GROWL. Extensive empirical results in simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrate that GROWL enjoys better performance than several other existing methods.
Haixu Ma, Donglin Zeng
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2022 Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments: A Supervised Clustering Approach Using Adaptive Fusion
abstract
Learning an optimal Individualized Treatment Rule (ITR) is a very important problem in precision medicine. This paper is concerned with the challenge when the number of treatment arms is large, and some groups of treatments in the large treatment space may work similarly for the patients. Motivated by the recent development of supervised clustering, we propose a novel adaptive fusion based method to cluster the treatments with similar treatment effects together and estimate the optimal ITR simultaneously through a single convex optimization. The problem is formulated as balancing \textit{loss}$+$\textit{penalty} terms with a tuning parameter, which allows the entire solution path of the treatment clustering process to be clearly visualized hierarchically. For computation, we propose an efficient algorithm based on accelerated proximal gradient and further conduct a novel group-lasso based algorithm for variable selection to boost the performance. Moreover, we demonstrate the theoretical guarantee of recovering the underlying true clustering structure of the treatments for our method. Finally, we demonstrate the superior performance of our method via both simulations and a real data application on cancer treatment, which may assist the decision making process for doctors.
Haixu Ma, Donglin Zeng
NeurIPS1