Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luis Herrmann

dblp:346/0915 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
chaotic dynamics
0.612022
Chaotic Dynamics are Intrinsic to Neural Network Training with SGD · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.612022
Chaotic Dynamics are Intrinsic to Neural Network Training with SGD · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.212022
Chaotic Dynamics are Intrinsic to Neural Network Training with SGD · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.6loss landscape curvature · 0.6eigenspectrum analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Chaotic Dynamics are Intrinsic to Neural Network Training with SGD
abstract
With the advent of deep learning over the last decade, a considerable amount of effort has gone into better understanding and enhancing Stochastic Gradient Descent so as to improve the performance and stability of artificial neural network training. Active research fields in this area include exploiting second order information of the loss landscape and improving the understanding of chaotic dynamics in optimization. This paper exploits the theoretical connection between the curvature of the loss landscape and chaotic dynamics in neural network training to propose a modified SGD ensuring non-chaotic training dynamics to study the importance thereof in NN training. Building on this, we present empirical evidence suggesting that the negative eigenspectrum - and thus directions of local chaos - cannot be removed from SGD without hurting training performance. Extending our empirical analysis to long-term chaos dynamics, we challenge the widespread understanding of convergence against a confined region in parameter space. Our results show that although chaotic network behavior is mostly confined to the initial training phase, models perturbed upon initialization do diverge at a slow pace even after reaching top training performance, and that their divergence can be modelled through a composition of a random walk and a linear divergence. The tools and insights developed as part of our work contribute to improving the understanding of neural network training dynamics and provide a basis for future improvements of optimization methods.
Luis Herrmann, Maximilian Granz, Tim Landgraf
NeurIPS1