Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neil P. Molino
dblp:347/1250
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8213-0404ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
report generation evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0ARGUE framework · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation EvaluationabstractGeneration of citation-backed reports is a primary use case for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. While open-source evaluation tools exist for various RAG tasks, tools designed for report generation are lacking. Accordingly, we introduce Auto-ARGUE, a robust LLM-based implementation of the recently proposed ARGUE framework for report generation evaluation. We present analysis of Auto-ARGUE on the report generation pilot task from the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR track and on two tasks from the TREC 2024 RAG track, showing good system-level correlations with human judgments. Additionally, we release ARGUE-viz, a web app for visualization and fine-grained analysis of Auto-ARGUE judgments and scores1. William Gantt Walden, Marc Mason, Orion Weller, Laura Dietz, John M. Conroy, Neil P. Molino, Hannah Recknor, Bryan Li, Gabrielle K. Liu, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Eugene Yang 0001 |
SIGIR | 6 |