Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neil P. Molino

dblp:347/1250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8213-0404ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
report generation evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
question answering
0.312026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0ARGUE framework · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation
abstract
Generation of citation-backed reports is a primary use case for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. While open-source evaluation tools exist for various RAG tasks, tools designed for report generation are lacking. Accordingly, we introduce Auto-ARGUE, a robust LLM-based implementation of the recently proposed ARGUE framework for report generation evaluation. We present analysis of Auto-ARGUE on the report generation pilot task from the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR track and on two tasks from the TREC 2024 RAG track, showing good system-level correlations with human judgments. Additionally, we release ARGUE-viz, a web app for visualization and fine-grained analysis of Auto-ARGUE judgments and scores1.
William Gantt Walden, Marc Mason, Orion Weller, Laura Dietz, John M. Conroy, Neil P. Molino, Hannah Recknor, Bryan Li, Gabrielle K. Liu, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Eugene Yang 0001
SIGIR6