Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gavin Li

dblp:347/2138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Question answering and dialogue systems · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 77% Security and privacy of machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
collaborative dialogue
0.912025
CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaborators · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
human-AI collaboration
0.912025
CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaborators · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-turn interaction
0.912025
CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaborators · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.912025
CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaborators · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement fine-tuning · 0.9multiturn-aware rewards · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaborators
abstract
Large Language Models are typically trained with next-turn rewards, limiting their ability to optimize for long-term interaction. As a result, they often respond passively to ambiguous or open-ended user requests, failing to help users reach their ultimate intents and leading to inefficient conversations. To address these limitations, we introduce CollabLLM, a novel and general training framework that enhances multiturn human-LLM collaboration. Its key innovation is a collaborative simulation that estimates the long-term contribution of responses using Multiturn-aware Rewards. By reinforcement fine-tuning these rewards, CollabLLM goes beyond responding to user requests, and actively uncovers user intent and offers insightful suggestions—a key step towards more human-centered AI. We also devise a multiturn interaction benchmark with three challenging tasks such as document creation. CollabLLM significantly outperforms our baselines with averages of 18.5% higher task performance and 46.3% improved interactivity by LLM judges. Finally, we conduct a large user study with 201 judges, where CollabLLM increases user satisfaction by 17.6% and reduces user spent time by 10.4%.
Shirley Wu, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Hao Cheng 0002, Gavin Li, Yao Dou, Weixin Cai, James Zou 0001, Jure Leskovec, Jianfeng Gao 0001
ICML5
2025 A First Look at Governments' Enterprise Security Guidance
Kimberly Ruth, Raymond Buernor Obu, Ifeoluwa Shode, Gavin Li, Carrie Gates, Grant Ho, Zakir Durumeric
USENIX Security Symposium4
2023 CERTainty: Detecting DNS Manipulation at Scale using TLS Certificates
abstract
DNS manipulation is an increasingly common technique used by censors and other network adversaries to prevent users from accessing restricted Internet resources and hijack their connections. Prior work in detecting DNS manipulation relies largely on comparing DNS resolutions with trusted control results to identify inconsistencies. However, the emergence of CDNs and other cloud providers practicing content localization and load balancing leads to these heuristics being inaccurate, paving the need for more verifiable signals of DNS manipulation. In this paper, we develop a new technique, CERTainty, that utilizes the widely established TLS certificate ecosystem to accurately detect DNS manipulation, and obtain more information about the adversaries performing such manipulation. We find that untrusted certificates, mismatching hostnames, and blockpages are powerful proxies for detecting DNS manipulation. Our results show that previous work using consistency-based heuristics is inaccurate, allowing for 72.45% false positives in the cases detected as DNS manipulation. Further, we identify 17 commercial DNS filtering products in 52 countries, including products such as SafeDNS, SkyDNS, and Fortinet, and identify the presence of 55 ASes in 26 countries that perform ISP-level DNS manipulation. We also identify 226 new blockpage clusters that are not covered by previous research. We are integrating techniques used by CERTainty into active measurement platforms to continuously and accurately monitor DNS manipulation.
Elisa Tsai, Deepak Kumar 0006, Ram Sundara Raman, Gavin Li, Yael Eiger, Roya Ensafi
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.4