VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sam Hawke
dblp:347/8644
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
statistical significance testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hypothesis testing · 1.5contrastive dimension estimator · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how?abstractDimension reduction (DR) is an important and widely studied technique in exploratory data analysis. However, traditional DR methods are not applicable to datasets with with a contrastive structure, where data are split into a foreground group of interest (case or treatment group), and a background group (control group). This type of data, common in biomedical studies, necessitates contrastive dimension reduction (CDR) methods to effectively capture information unique to or enriched in the foreground group relative to the background group. Despite the development of various CDR methods, two critical questions remain underexplored: when should these methods be applied, and how can the information unique to the foreground group be quantified? In this work, we address these gaps by proposing a hypothesis test to determine the existence of contrastive information, and introducing a contrastive dimension estimator (CDE) to quantify the unique components in the foreground group. We provide theoretical support for our methods and validate their effectiveness through extensive simulated, semi-simulated, and real experiments involving images, gene expressions, protein expressions, and medical sensors, demonstrating their ability to identify the unique information in the foreground group. Sam Hawke, Yueen Ma 0002, Didong Li |
NeurIPS | 1 |