Sam Hawke

dblp:347/8644 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.812024
Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024
Information retrieval › evaluation
statistical significance testing
0.812024
Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.212024
Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how? · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 1.5contrastive dimension estimator · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how?
abstract
Dimension reduction (DR) is an important and widely studied technique in exploratory data analysis. However, traditional DR methods are not applicable to datasets with with a contrastive structure, where data are split into a foreground group of interest (case or treatment group), and a background group (control group). This type of data, common in biomedical studies, necessitates contrastive dimension reduction (CDR) methods to effectively capture information unique to or enriched in the foreground group relative to the background group. Despite the development of various CDR methods, two critical questions remain underexplored: when should these methods be applied, and how can the information unique to the foreground group be quantified? In this work, we address these gaps by proposing a hypothesis test to determine the existence of contrastive information, and introducing a contrastive dimension estimator (CDE) to quantify the unique components in the foreground group. We provide theoretical support for our methods and validate their effectiveness through extensive simulated, semi-simulated, and real experiments involving images, gene expressions, protein expressions, and medical sensors, demonstrating their ability to identify the unique information in the foreground group.
Sam Hawke, Yueen Ma 0002, Didong Li
NeurIPS1