Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keming Ye

dblp:347/8749 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Question answering and dialogue systems · 24% Language models and text generation · 24%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering
knowledge integration
0.912025
Optimize Incompatible Parameters Through Compatibility-aware Knowledge Integration · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.912025
Optimize Incompatible Parameters Through Compatibility-aware Knowledge Integration · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.712023
StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
0.712023
StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering over structured data
0.712023
StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model › tool-augmented language models
tool-augmented reasoning
0.712023
StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pretrained model reuse
0.312025
Optimize Incompatible Parameters Through Compatibility-aware Knowledge Integration · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter splicing · 0.9parameter compatibility assessment · 0.9tool augmentation · 0.7iterative reading-then-reasoning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimize Incompatible Parameters Through Compatibility-aware Knowledge Integration
abstract
Deep neural networks have become foundational to advancements in multiple domains, including recommendation systems, natural language processing, and so on. Despite their successes, these models often contain incompatible parameters that can be underutilized or detrimental to model performance, particularly when faced with specific, varying data distributions. Existing research excels in removing such parameters or merging the outputs of multiple different pretrained models. However, the former focuses on efficiency rather than performance, while the latter requires several times more computing and storage resources to support inference. In this paper, we set the goal to explicitly improve these incompatible parameters by leveraging the complementary strengths of different models, thereby directly enhancing the models without any additional parameters. Specifically, we propose Compatibility-aware Knowledge Integration (CKI), which consists of Parameter Compatibility Assessment and Parameter Splicing, which are used to evaluate the knowledge content of multiple models and integrate the knowledge into one model, respectively. The integrated model can be used directly for inference or for further fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on various recommendation and language datasets show that CKI can effectively optimize incompatible parameters under multiple tasks and settings to break through the training limit of the original model without increasing the inference cost.
Zheqi Lv, Keming Ye, Zishu Wei, Qi Tian 0003, Shengyu Zhang 0001, Wenqiao Zhang, Wenjie Wang 0007, Kun Kuang 0001, Tat-Seng Chua, Fei Wu 0001
AAAI2
2023 StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data
abstract
In this paper, we aim to improve the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) over structured data in a unified way.Inspired by the studies on tool augmentation for LLMs, we develop an Iterative Reading-then-Reasoning (IRR) framework to solve question answering tasks based on structured data, called StructGPT.In this framework, we construct the specialized interfaces to collect relevant evidence from structured data (i.e., reading), and let LLMs concentrate on the reasoning task based on the collected information (i.e., reasoning).Specially, we propose an invokinglinearization-generation procedure to support LLMs in reasoning on the structured data with the help of the interfaces.By iterating this procedure with provided interfaces, our approach can gradually approach the target answers to a given query.Experiments conducted on three types of structured data show that StructGPT greatly improves the performance of LLMs, under the few-shot and zero-shot settings.Our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/StructGPT.
Jinhao Jiang, Kun Zhou 0002, Zican Dong, Keming Ye, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen
EMNLP4