Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rares Cristian

dblp:348/0215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty › robust optimization
distributionally robust optimization
0.812024
A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization
0.812024
A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.812024
A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
differentiable optimization
0.712023
End-to-End Learning for Optimization via Constraint-Enforcing Approximators · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 1.3end-to-end learning · 1.3alternate projections · 1.3learning-integrated optimization · 0.8discretization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization
abstract
We study contextual stochastic optimization problems. Optimization problems have uncertain parameters stemming from unknown, context-dependent, distributions. Due to the inherent uncertainty in these problems, one is often interested not only in minimizing expected cost, but also to be robust and protect against worst case scenarios. We propose a novel method that combines the learning stage with knowledge of the downstream optimization task. The method prescribes decisions which aim to maximize the likelihood that the cost is below a (user-controlled) threshold. The key idea is (1) to discretize the feasible region into subsets so that the uncertain objective function can be well approximated deterministically within each subset, and (2) devise a secondary optimization problem to prescribe decisions by integrating the individual approximations determined in step (1). We provide theoretical guarantees bounding the underlying regret of decisions proposed by our method. In addition, experimental results demonstrate that our approach is competitive in terms of average regret and yields more robust solutions than other methods proposed in the literature, including up to 20 times lower worst-case cost on a real-world electricity generation problem.
Rares Cristian, Georgia Perakis
ICLR1
2023 End-to-End Learning for Optimization via Constraint-Enforcing Approximators
abstract
In many real-world applications, predictive methods are used to provide inputs for downstream optimization problems. It has been shown that using the downstream task-based objective to learn the intermediate predictive model is often better than using only intermediate task objectives, such as prediction error. The learning task in the former approach is referred to as end-to-end learning. The difficulty in end-to-end learning lies in differentiating through the optimization problem. Therefore, we propose a neural network architecture that can learn to approximately solve these optimization problems, particularly ensuring its output satisfies the feasibility constraints via alternate projections. We show these projections converge at a geometric rate to the exact projection. Our approach is more computationally efficient than existing methods as we do not need to solve the original optimization problem at each iteration. Furthermore, our approach can be applied to a wider range of optimization problems. We apply this to a shortest path problem for which the first stage forecasting problem is a computer vision task of predicting edge costs from terrain maps, a capacitated multi-product newsvendor problem, and a maximum matching problem. We show that this method out-performs existing approaches in terms of final task-based loss and training time.
Rares Cristian, Pavithra Harsha, Georgia Perakis, Brian Quanz, Ioannis Spantidakis
AAAI1