Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rares Cristian
dblp:348/0215
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty › robust optimization
distributionally robust optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
differentiable optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Learning for Optimization via Constraint-Enforcing Approximators · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 1.3end-to-end learning · 1.3alternate projections · 1.3learning-integrated optimization · 0.8discretization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Discretization Framework for Robust Contextual Stochastic OptimizationabstractWe study contextual stochastic optimization problems. Optimization problems have uncertain parameters stemming from unknown, context-dependent, distributions. Due to the inherent uncertainty in these problems, one is often interested not only in minimizing expected cost, but also to be robust and protect against worst case scenarios. We propose a novel method that combines the learning stage with knowledge of the downstream optimization task. The method prescribes decisions which aim to maximize the likelihood that the cost is below a (user-controlled) threshold. The key idea is (1) to discretize the feasible region into subsets so that the uncertain objective function can be well approximated deterministically within each subset, and (2) devise a secondary optimization problem to prescribe decisions by integrating the individual approximations determined in step (1). We provide theoretical guarantees bounding the underlying regret of decisions proposed by our method. In addition, experimental results demonstrate that our approach is competitive in terms of average regret and yields more robust solutions than other methods proposed in the literature, including up to 20 times lower worst-case cost on a real-world electricity generation problem. Rares Cristian, Georgia Perakis |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | End-to-End Learning for Optimization via Constraint-Enforcing ApproximatorsabstractIn many real-world applications, predictive methods are used to provide inputs for downstream optimization problems. It has been shown that using the downstream task-based objective to learn the intermediate predictive model is often better than using only intermediate task objectives, such as prediction error. The learning task in the former approach is referred to as end-to-end learning. The difficulty in end-to-end learning lies in differentiating through the optimization problem. Therefore, we propose a neural network architecture that can learn to approximately solve these optimization problems, particularly ensuring its output satisfies the feasibility constraints via alternate projections. We show these projections converge at a geometric rate to the exact projection. Our approach is more computationally efficient than existing methods as we do not need to solve the original optimization problem at each iteration. Furthermore, our approach can be applied to a wider range of optimization problems. We apply this to a shortest path problem for which the first stage forecasting problem is a computer vision task of predicting edge costs from terrain maps, a capacitated multi-product newsvendor problem, and a maximum matching problem. We show that this method out-performs existing approaches in terms of final task-based loss and training time. Rares Cristian, Pavithra Harsha, Georgia Perakis, Brian Quanz, Ioannis Spantidakis |
AAAI | 1 |