VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gaotang Li
dblp:348/5271
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-3294-1347ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Graph learning · 56% Language models and text generation · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | Tackling Size Generalization of Graph Neural Networks on Biological Data from a Spectral Perspective · KDD (2) 2025 On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural Networks · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
attention intervention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
inference-time intervention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › retrieval-augmented generation
knowledge conflict |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
parametric vs contextual knowledge |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network generalization
size generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tackling Size Generalization of Graph Neural Networks on Biological Data from a Spectral Perspective · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterophily |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph compression
graph sparsification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural Networks · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural Networks · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
attention head analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tackling Size Generalization of Graph Neural Networks on Biological Data from a Spectral Perspective · KDD (2) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
explainability · 1.3edge selection · 1.3theoretical analysis · 0.9spectral analysis · 0.9dual-run approach · 0.9attention mechanism · 0.9attention intervention · 0.9learnable decoder · 0.8ego-neighbor embedding separation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language ModelsabstractLanguage Models (LMs) often encounter knowledge conflicts when parametric memory contradicts contextual knowledge.
Previous works attribute this conflict to the interplay between "memory heads" and "context heads", attention heads assumed to promote either memory or context exclusively. In this study, we go beyond this fundamental assumption by uncovering a critical phenomenon we term the *superposition of contextual information and parametric memory*, where highly influential attention heads simultaneously contribute to both memory and context. Building upon this insight, we propose Just Run Twice (JuICE), a test-time attention intervention method that steers LMs toward either parametric beliefs or contextual knowledge without requiring fine-tuning. JuICE identifies a set of reliable attention heads and leverages a dual-run approach to mitigate the superposition effects. Extensive experiments across 11 datasets and 6 model architectures demonstrate that JuICE sets the new state-of-the-art performance and robust generalization, achieving significant and consistent improvement across different domains under various conflict types. Finally, we theoretically analyze knowledge conflict and the superposition of contextual information and parametric memory in attention heads, which further elucidates the effectiveness of JuICE in these settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/GaotangLi/JUICE. Gaotang Li, Yuzhong Chen 0004, Hanghang Tong |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Tackling Size Generalization of Graph Neural Networks on Biological Data from a Spectral PerspectiveabstractWe address the key challenge of size-induced distribution shifts in graph neural networks (GNNs) and their impact on the generalization of GNNs to larger graphs. Existing literature operates under diverse assumptions about distribution shifts, resulting in varying conclusions about the generalizability of GNNs. In contrast to prior work, we adopt a data-driven approach to identify and characterize the types of size-induced distribution shifts and explore their impact on GNN performance from a spectral standpoint, a perspective that has been largely underexplored. Leveraging the significant variance in graph sizes in real biological datasets, we analyze biological graphs and find that spectral differences-driven by subgraph patterns (e.g., average cycle length)-strongly correlate with GNN performance on larger, unseen graphs. Based on these insights, we propose three model-agnostic strategies to enhance GNNs' awareness of critical subgraph patterns, identifying size-intensive attention as the most effective approach. Extensive experiments with six GNN architectures and seven model-agnostic strategies across five datasets show that our size-intensive attention strategy significantly improves graph classification on test graphs 2 to 10 times larger than the training graphs, boosting F1 scores by up to 8% over strong baselines. Gaotang Li, Danai Koutra, Yujun Yan |
KDD (2) | 1 |
| 2024 | On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural NetworksabstractHeterophily, or the tendency of connected nodes in networks to have different class labels or dissimilar features, has been identified as challenging for many Graph Neural Network (GNN) models. While the challenges of applying GNNs for node classification when class labels display strong heterophily are well understood, it is unclear how heterophily affects GNN performance in other important graph learning tasks where class labels are not available. In this work, we focus on the link prediction task and systematically analyze the impact of heterophily in node features on GNN performance. We first introduce formal definitions of homophilic and heterophilic link prediction tasks, and present a theoretical framework that highlights the different optimizations needed for the respective tasks. We then analyze how different link prediction encoders and decoders adapt to varying levels of feature homophily and introduce designs for improved performance. Based on our definitions, we identify and analyze six real-world benchmarks spanning from homophilic to heterophilic link prediction settings, with graphs containing up to 30M edges. Our empirical analysis on a variety of synthetic and real-world datasets confirms our theoretical insights and highlights the importance of adopting learnable decoders and GNN encoders with ego- and neighbor-embedding separation in message passing for link prediction tasks beyond homophily. Jiong Zhu, Gaotang Li, Yao-An Yang, Jing Zhu 0005, Xuehao Cui, Danai Koutra |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural NetworksabstractBrain graphs, which model the structural and functional relationships between brain regions, are crucial in neuroscientific and clinical applications that can be formulated as graph classification tasks. However, dense brain graphs pose computational challenges such as large time and memory consumption and poor model interpretability. In this paper, we investigate effective designs in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to sparsify brain graphs by eliminating noisy edges. Many prior works select noisy edges based on explainability or task-irrelevant properties, but this does not guarantee performance improvement when using the sparsified graphs. Additionally, the selection of noisy edges is often tailored to each individual graph, making it challenging to sparsify multiple graphs collectively using the same approach. Gaotang Li, Marlena Duda, Xiang Zhang 0012, Danai Koutra, Yujun Yan |
KDD | 1 |