Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco Inversi
dblp:348/6805
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffeomorphism · 1.5continuity equation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation LawsabstractWe introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time.
By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation,
a PDE describing mass conservation in its differential form.
Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as
time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps.
This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields.
Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time.
The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density.
Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE.
LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D,
while being computationally efficient.
As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements. Fabricio Arend Torres, Marcello Massimo Negri, Marco Inversi, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |