VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Krishna Ronanki
dblp:348/8793
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-8242-6771ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Recommendations for efficient and responsible LLM adoption within industrial software developmentabstractContext: Large language models (LLMs) are observed to have a significant positive impact on various software engineering (SE) activities. With improved accessibility, the adoption of powerful LLMs in industry has surged recently. However, there is a lack of actionable best practices for the efficient and responsible adoption of LLMs within industrial software settings. Objectives: We developed seven actionable recommendations to address this research gap. Methods: We conducted a multi-case study with three organisations that use LLMs within their SE activities and synthesised seven recommendations through qualitative thematic analysis. We conducted a complementary online survey with software practitioners from various industries to evaluate the perceived relevance of our recommendations. Results: Our results and recommendations focus on (i) users’ preference to use LLMs as AI assistants, (ii) the importance of relevant stakeholders’ satisfaction in the LLM-output evaluation, (iii) scoping the applicability of LLMs within SE tasks, (iv) the effect of LLMs on SE workflows, (v) the necessity and directions for developing human oversight mechanisms, and (vi) the necessary skills for practitioners for leveraging LLMs within SE. The online survey indicates a high level of agreement from the participants regarding the perceived relevance of the recommendations. Conclusion: We outline future research directions, including mapping the seven recommendations to the principles of the EU AI Act (AIA) in order to examine how they relate to the current regulatory compliance frameworks. Krishna Ronanki, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Tomas Herda, Stefan Sitkovich, Jennifer Horkoff, Christian Berger 0001 |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 1 |
| 2025 | Prompt Engineering Guidelines for Using Large Language Models in Requirements Engineering
Krishna Ronanki, Simon Arvidsson, Johan Axell |
SEAA (3) | 1 |
| 2025 | Large Language Models in Code Co-generation for Safe Autonomous Vehicles
Ali Nouri, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Zhennan Fei, Krishna Ronanki, Håkan Sivencrona, Christian Berger 0001 |
SAFECOMP | 4 |
| 2024 | Prompt Smells: An Omen for Undesirable Generative AI OutputsabstractRecent trends in the world of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) focus on developing deep learning (DL)-based models capable of learning structures and temporal patterns from supplied training data to generate content in different formats like text, images, or sound. GenAI models have been widely used in various applications, including creating stories, illustrations, poems, articles, computer code, music compositions, and videos [5, 11]. Krishna Ronanki, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Christian Berger 0001 |
CAIN | 1 |
| 2023 | Investigating ChatGPT's Potential to Assist in Requirements Elicitation ProcessesabstractNatural Language Processing (NLP) for Requirements Engineering (RE) (NLP4RE) seeks to apply NLP tools, techniques, and resources to the RE process to increase the quality of the requirements. There is little research involving the utilization of Generative AI-based NLP tools and techniques for requirements elicitation. In recent times, Large Language Models (LLM) like ChatGPT have gained significant recognition due to their notably improved performance in NLP tasks. To explore the potential of ChatGPT to assist in requirements elicitation processes, we formulated six questions to elicit requirements using ChatGPT. Using the same six questions, we conducted interview-based surveys with five RE experts from academia and industry and collected 30 responses containing requirements. The quality of these 36 responses (human-formulated + ChatGPT-generated) was evaluated over seven different requirements quality attributes by another five RE experts through a second round of interview-based surveys. In comparing the quality of requirements generated by ChatGPT with those formulated by human experts, we found that ChatGPT-generated requirements are highly Abstract, Atomic, Consistent, Correct, and Understandable. Based on these results, we present the most pressing issues related to LLMs and what future research should focus on to leverage the emergent behaviour of LLMs more effectively in natural language-based RE activities. Krishna Ronanki, Christian Berger 0001, Jennifer Horkoff |
SEAA | 1 |