Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kusha Sareen

dblp:348/9545 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 50% Language models and text generation · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 50% Computational complexity · 25% Computational geometry · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Diffusion Tree Sampling: Scalable inference‑time alignment of diffusion models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model
0.912025
Energy Loss Functions for Physical Systems · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
inference-time alignment
0.912025
Diffusion Tree Sampling: Scalable inference‑time alignment of diffusion models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.912025
Energy Loss Functions for Physical Systems · NeurIPS 2025
Computational complexity
communication complexity
0.812024
Communication Complexity and Discrepancy of Halfplanes · SoCG 2024
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
discrepancy theory
0.812024
Communication Complexity and Discrepancy of Halfplanes · SoCG 2024
Computational geometry › range searching › halfspace range searching
halfplane range searching
0.812024
Communication Complexity and Discrepancy of Halfplanes · SoCG 2024
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › discrepancy theory
hereditary discrepancy
0.812024
Communication Complexity and Discrepancy of Halfplanes · SoCG 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular modeling
0.312025
Energy Loss Functions for Physical Systems · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reverse KL divergence · 1.7energy loss · 1.7boltzmann distribution · 1.7reward propagation · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9discrepancy bounds · 0.8communication complexity · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Diffusion Tree Sampling: Scalable inference‑time alignment of diffusion models
abstract
Adapting a pretrained diffusion model to new objectives at inference time remains an open problem in generative modeling. Existing steering methods suffer from inaccurate value estimation, especially at high noise levels, which biases guidance. Moreover, information from past runs is not reused to improve sample quality, leading to inefficient use of compute. Inspired by the success of Monte Carlo Tree Search, we address these limitations by casting inference-time alignment as a search problem that reuses past computations. We introduce a tree-based approach that _samples_ from the reward-aligned target density by propagating terminal rewards back through the diffusion chain and iteratively refining value estimates with each additional generation. Our proposed method, Diffusion Tree Sampling (DTS), produces asymptotically exact samples from the target distribution in the limit of infinite rollouts, and its greedy variant Diffusion Tree Search (DTS*) performs a robust search for high reward samples. On MNIST and CIFAR-10 class-conditional generation, DTS matches the FID of the best-performing baseline with up to $5\times$ less compute. In text-to-image generation and language completion tasks, DTS* effectively searches for high reward samples that match best-of-N with $2\times$ less compute. By reusing information from previous generations, we get an _anytime algorithm_ that turns additional compute budget into steadily better samples, providing a scalable approach for inference-time alignment of diffusion models.
Vineet Jain, Kusha Sareen, Mohammad Pedramfar, Siamak Ravanbakhsh
NeurIPS2
2025 Energy Loss Functions for Physical Systems
abstract
Effectively leveraging prior knowledge of a system’s physics is crucial for applications of machine learning to scientific domains. Previous approaches mostly focused on incorporating physical insights at the architectural level. In this paper, we propose a framework to leverage physical information directly into the loss function for prediction and generative modeling tasks on systems like molecules and spins. We derive energy loss functions assuming that each data sample is in thermal equilibrium with respect to an approximate energy landscape. By using the reverse KL divergence with a Boltzmann distribution around the data, we obtain the loss as an energy difference between the data and the model predictions. This perspective also recasts traditional objectives like MSE as energy-based, but with a physically meaningless energy. In contrast, our formulation yields physically grounded loss functions with gradients that better align with valid configurations, while being architecture-agnostic and computationally efficient. The energy loss functions also inherently respect physical symmetries. We demonstrate our approach on molecular generation and spin ground-state prediction and report significant improvements over baselines.
Sékou-Oumar Kaba, Kusha Sareen, Daniel Levy 0001, Siamak Ravanbakhsh
NeurIPS2
2024 Communication Complexity and Discrepancy of Halfplanes
abstract
We study the discrepancy of the following communication problem. Alice receives a halfplane, and Bob receives a point in the plane, and their goal is to determine whether Bob’s point belongs to Alice’s halfplane. This communication task corresponds to determining whether x₁y₁+y₂ ≥ x₂, where the first player knows (x₁,x₂) and the second player knows (y₁,y₂). Denoting n = m³, we show that when the inputs are chosen from [m] × [m²], the communication discrepancy of the above problem is O(n^{-1/6} log^{3/2} n). On the other hand, through the connections to the notion of hereditary discrepancy by Matoušek, Nikolov, and Tawler (IMRN 2020) and a classical result of Matoušek (Discrete Comput. Geom. 1995), we show that the communication discrepancy of every set of n points and n halfplanes is at least Ω(n^{-1/4} log^{-1} n).
Manasseh Ahmed, TsunMing Cheung, Hamed Hatami, Kusha Sareen
SoCG4