VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jannis Kiesel
dblp:348/9942
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7412-3746ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Confidentiality-Preserving Verifiable Business Processes Through Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Jannis Kiesel, Jonathan Heiss |
EDOC | 1 |
| 2025 | A Non-Intrusive Framework for Deferred Integration of Cloud Patterns in Energy-Efficient Data-Sharing Pipelines
Sepideh Masoudi, Mark Edward Michael Daly, Jannis Kiesel, Stefan Tai |
ICSOC (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Hook-in Privacy Techniques for gRPC-Based Microservice Communication
Louis Loechel, Siar-Remzi Akbayin, Elias Grünewald, Jannis Kiesel, Inga Strelnikova, Thomas Janke, Frank Pallas |
ICWE | 4 |
| 2023 | Hawk: DevOps-driven Transparency and Accountability in Cloud Native SystemsabstractTransparency is one of the most important principles of modern privacy regulations, such as the GDPR or CCPA. To be compliant with such regulatory frameworks, data controllers must provide data subjects with precise information about the collection, processing, storage, and transfer of personal data. To do so, respective facts and details must be compiled and always kept up to date. In traditional, rather static system environments, this inventory (including details such as the purposes of processing or the storage duration for each system component) could be done manually. In current circumstances of agile, DevOps-driven, and cloud-native information systems engineering, however, such manual practices do not suit anymore, making it increasingly hard for data controllers to achieve regulatory compliance. To allow for proper collection and maintenance of always up-to-date transparency information smoothly integrating into DevOps practices, we herein propose a set of novel approaches explicitly tailored to specific phases of the DevOps lifecycle most relevant in matters of privacy-related transparency and accountability at runtime: Release, Operation, and Monitoring. For each of these phases, we examine the specific challenges arising in determining the details of personal data processing, develop a distinct approach and provide respective proof of concept implementations that can easily be applied in cloud native systems. We also demonstrate how these components can be integrated with each other to establish transparency information comprising design- and runtime-elements. Furthermore, our experimental evaluation indicates reasonable overheads. On this basis, data controllers can fulfill their regulatory transparency obligations in line with actual engineering practices. Elias Grünewald, Jannis Kiesel, Siar-Remzi Akbayin, Frank Pallas |
CLOUD | 2 |