Neta Shaul

dblp:349/2355 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Generative modeling · 75% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% Language models and text generation · 8%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
3.952025
Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
Bespoke Non-Stationary Solvers for Fast Sampling of Diffusion and Flow Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
2.632025
Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2025
Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective · ICLR 2025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
2.232024
Bespoke Non-Stationary Solvers for Fast Sampling of Diffusion and Flow Models · ICML 2024
Bespoke Solvers for Generative Flow Models · ICLR 2024
On Kinetic Optimal Probability Paths for Generative Models · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model
1.722025
Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective · ICLR 2025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
1.622025
Corrector Sampling in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Bespoke Solvers for Generative Flow Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
ODE solvers
1.522024
Bespoke Non-Stationary Solvers for Fast Sampling of Diffusion and Flow Models · ICML 2024
Bespoke Solvers for Generative Flow Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.912025
Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.912025
Corrector Sampling in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
error accumulation mitigation
0.912025
Corrector Sampling in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
discrete flow matching
0.812024
Discrete Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › neural text generation
non-autoregressive text generation
0.812024
Discrete Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.812024
Bespoke Non-Stationary Solvers for Fast Sampling of Diffusion and Flow Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.312025
Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-deterministic probability transition kernel · 0.9markov transition kernels · 0.9markov process generators · 0.9kinetic energy optimization · 0.9jump processes · 0.9generator matching · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9continuous-time markov chain · 0.9autoregressive sampling · 0.9model distillation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes
abstract
We introduce Generator Matching, a modality-agnostic framework for generative modeling using arbitrary Markov processes. Generators characterize the infinitesimal evolution of a Markov process, which we leverage for generative modeling in a similar vein to flow matching: we construct conditional generators which generate single data points, then learn to approximate the marginal generator which generates the full data distribution. We show that Generator Matching unifies various generative modeling methods, including diffusion models, flow matching and discrete diffusion models. Furthermore, it expands the design space to new and unexplored Markov processes such as jump processes. Finally, Generator Matching enables the construction of superpositions of Markov generative models and enables the construction of multimodal models in a rigorous manner. We empirically validate our method on image and multimodal generation, e.g. showing that superposition with a jump process improves performance.
Peter Holderrieth, Marton Havasi, Jason Yim, Neta Shaul, Itai Gat, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Brian Karrer, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yaron Lipman
ICLR4
2025 Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective
abstract
The design space of discrete-space diffusion or flow generative models are significantly less well-understood than their continuous-space counterparts, with many works focusing only on a simple masked construction. In this work, we aim to take a holistic approach to the construction of discrete generative models based on continuous-time Markov chains, and for the first time, allow the use of arbitrary discrete probability paths, or colloquially, corruption processes. Through the lens of optimizing the symmetric kinetic energy, we propose velocity formulas that can be applied to any given probability path, completely decoupling the probability and velocity, and giving the user the freedom to specify any desirable probability path based on expert knowledge specific to the data domain. Furthermore, we find that a special construction of mixture probability paths optimizes the symmetric kinetic energy for the discrete case. We empirically validate the usefulness of this new design space across multiple modalities: text generation, inorganic material generation, and image generation. We find that we can outperform the mask construction even in text with kinetic-optimal mixture paths, while we can make use of domain-specific constructions of the probability path over the visual domain.
Neta Shaul, Itai Gat, Marton Havasi, Daniel Severo 0001, Anuroop Sriram, Peter Holderrieth, Brian Karrer, Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen
ICLR1
2025 Corrector Sampling in Language Models
abstract
Autoregressive language models accumulate errors due to their fixed, irrevocable left-to-right token generation. To address this, we propose a new sampling method called Resample-Previous-Tokens (RPT). RPT mitigates error accumulation by iteratively revisiting and potentially replacing tokens in a window of previously generated text. Fine-tuning a pretrained 8B parameter model with RPT for only 100B resulted in ~10% relative improvements on reasoning and coding benchmarks compared to the standard sampling.
Itai Gat, Neta Shaul, Uriel Singer, Yaron Lipman
NeurIPS2
2025 Transition Matching: Scalable and Flexible Generative Modeling
abstract
Diffusion and flow matching models have significantly advanced media generation, yet their design space is well-explored, somewhat limiting further improvements. Concurrently, autoregressive (AR) models, particularly those generating continuous tokens, have emerged as a promising direction for unifying text and media generation, showing improved performance at scale. This paper introduces Transition Matching (TM), a novel discrete-time, continuous-state generative paradigm that unifies and advances both diffusion/flow models and continuous AR generation. TM decomposes complex generation tasks into simpler Markov transitions, allowing for expressive non-deterministic probability transition kernels and arbitrary non-continuous supervision processes, thereby unlocking new flexible design avenues. We explore these choices through three TM variants: (i) Difference Transition Matching (DTM), which generalizes flow matching to discrete-time by directly learning transition probabilities, yielding state-of-the-art image quality and text adherence. (ii) Autoregressive Transition Matching (ARTM) and (iii) Full History Transition Matching (FHTM) are partially and fully causal models, respectively, that generalize continuous AR methods. They achieve continuous causal AR generation quality comparable to non-causal approaches and potentially enable seamless integration with existing AR text generation techniques. Notably, FHTM is the first fully causal model to match or surpass the performance of flow-based methods on text-to-image task in continuous domains. We demonstrate these contributions through a rigorous large-scale comparison of TM variants and relevant baselines, maintaining a fixed architecture, training data, and hyperparameters.
Neta Shaul, Uriel Singer, Itai Gat, Yaron Lipman
NeurIPS1
2024 Bespoke Solvers for Generative Flow Models
abstract
Diffusion or flow-based models are powerful generative paradigms that are notoriously hard to sample as samples are defined as solutions to high-dimensional Ordinary or Stochastic Differential Equations (ODEs/SDEs) which require a large Number of Function Evaluations (NFE) to approximate well. Existing methods to alleviate the costly sampling process include model distillation and designing dedicated ODE solvers. However, distillation is costly to train and sometimes can deteriorate quality, while dedicated solvers still require relatively large NFE to produce high quality samples. In this paper we introduce ``Bespoke solvers'', a novel framework for constructing custom ODE solvers tailored to the ODE of a given pre-trained flow model. Our approach optimizes an order consistent and parameter-efficient solver (e.g., with 80 learnable parameters), is trained for roughly 1\% of the GPU time required for training the pre-trained model, and significantly improves approximation and generation quality compared to dedicated solvers. For example, a Bespoke solver for a CIFAR10 model produces samples with Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) of 2.73 with 10 NFE, and gets to 1\% of the Ground Truth (GT) FID (2.59) for this model with only 20 NFE. On the more challenging ImageNet-64$\times$64, Bespoke samples at 2.2 FID with 10 NFE, and gets within 2\% of GT FID (1.71) with 20 NFE.
Neta Shaul, Juan C. Pérez, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Ali K. Thabet, Albert Pumarola, Yaron Lipman
ICLR1
2024 Bespoke Non-Stationary Solvers for Fast Sampling of Diffusion and Flow Models
abstract
This paper introduces Bespoke Non-Stationary (BNS) Solvers, a solver distillation approach to improve sample efficiency of Diffusion and Flow models. BNS solvers are based on a family of non-stationary solvers that provably subsumes existing numerical ODE solvers and consequently demonstrate considerable improvement in sample approximation (PSNR) over these baselines. Compared to model distillation, BNS solvers benefit from a tiny parameter space ($<$200 parameters), fast optimization (two orders of magnitude faster), maintain diversity of samples, and in contrast to previous solver distillation approaches nearly close the gap from standard distillation methods such as Progressive Distillation in the low-medium NFE regime. For example, BNS solver achieves 45 PSNR / 1.76 FID using 16 NFE in class-conditional ImageNet-64. We experimented with BNS solvers for conditional image generation, text-to-image generation, and text-2-audio generation showing significant improvement in sample approximation (PSNR) in all.
Neta Shaul, Uriel Singer, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Matt Le 0001, Ali K. Thabet, Albert Pumarola, Yaron Lipman
ICML1
2024 Discrete Flow Matching
abstract
Despite Flow Matching and diffusion models having emerged as powerful generative paradigms for continuous variables such as images and videos, their application to high-dimensional discrete data, such as language, is still limited. In this work, we present Discrete Flow Matching, a novel discrete flow paradigm designed specifically for generating discrete data. Discrete Flow Matching offers several key contributions: (i) it works with a general family of probability paths interpolating between source and target distributions; (ii) it allows for a generic formula for sampling from these probability paths using learned posteriors such as the probability denoiser ($x$-prediction) and noise-prediction ($\epsilon$-prediction); (iii) practically, focusing on specific probability paths defined with different schedulers improves generative perplexity compared to previous discrete diffusion and flow models; and (iv) by scaling Discrete Flow Matching models up to 1.7B parameters, we reach 6.7% Pass@1 and 13.4% Pass@10 on HumanEval and 6.7% Pass@1 and 20.6% Pass@10 on 1-shot MBPP coding benchmarks. Our approach is capable of generating high-quality discrete data in a non-autoregressive fashion, significantly closing the gap between autoregressive models and discrete flow models.
Itai Gat, Tal Remez, Neta Shaul, Felix Kreuk, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, Yaron Lipman
NeurIPS3
2023 On Kinetic Optimal Probability Paths for Generative Models
abstract
Recent successful generative models are trained by fitting a neural network to an a-priori defined tractable probability density path taking noise to training examples. In this paper we investigate the space of Gaussian probability paths, which includes diffusion paths as an instance, and look for an optimal member in some useful sense. In particular, minimizing the Kinetic Energy (KE) of a path is known to make particles' trajectories simple, hence easier to sample, and empirically improve performance in terms of likelihood of unseen data and sample generation quality. We investigate Kinetic Optimal (KO) Gaussian paths and offer the following observations: (i) We show the KE takes a simplified form on the space of Gaussian paths, where the data is incorporated only through a single, one dimensional scalar function, called the *data separation function*. (ii) We characterize the KO solutions with a one dimensional ODE. (iii) We approximate data-dependent KO paths by approximating the data separation function and minimizing the KE. (iv) We prove that the data separation function converges to $1$ in the general case of arbitrary normalized dataset consisting of $n$ samples in $d$ dimension as $n/\sqrt{d}\rightarrow 0$. A consequence of this result is that the Conditional Optimal Transport (Cond-OT) path becomes *kinetic optimal* as $n/\sqrt{d}\rightarrow 0$. We further support this theory with empirical experiments on ImageNet.
Neta Shaul, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Maximilian Nickel, Matt Le 0001, Yaron Lipman
ICML1