Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alberto Cabezas
dblp:349/4353
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 0.8flow matching · 0.8continuous normalizing flow · 0.8adaptive tempering · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing FlowsabstractContinuous normalizing flows (CNFs) learn the probability path between a reference distribution and a target distribution by modeling the vector field generating said path using neural networks. Recently, Lipman et al. (2022) introduced a simple and inexpensive method for training CNFs in generative modeling, termed flow matching (FM). In this paper, we repurpose this method for probabilistic inference by incorporating Markovian sampling methods in evaluating the FM objective, and using the learned CNF to improve Monte Carlo sampling. Specifically, we propose an adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, which combines a local Markov transition kernel with a non-local, flow-informed transition kernel, defined using a CNF. This CNF is adapted on-the-fly using samples from the Markov chain, which are used to specify the probability path for the FM objective. Our method also includes an adaptive tempering mechanism that allows the discovery of multiple modes in the target distribution. Under mild assumptions, we establish convergence of our method to a local optimum of the FM objective. We then benchmark our approach on several synthetic and real-world examples, achieving similar performance to other state-of-the-art methods but often at a significantly lower computational cost. Alberto Cabezas, Louis Sharrock, Christopher Nemeth |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Transport Elliptical Slice SamplingabstractWe propose a new framework for efficiently sampling from complex probability distributions using a combination of normalizing flows and elliptical slice sampling (Murray et al., 2010). The central idea is to learn a diffeomorphism, through normalizing flows, that maps the non-Gaussian structure of the target distribution to an approximately Gaussian distribution. We then use the elliptical slice sampler, an efficient and tuning-free Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, to sample from the transformed distribution. The samples are then pulled back using the inverse normalizing flow, yielding samples that approximate the stationary target distribution of interest. Our transport elliptical slice sampler (TESS) is optimized for modern computer architectures, where its adaptation mechanism utilizes parallel cores to rapidly run multiple Markov chains for a few iterations. Numerical demonstrations show that TESS produces Monte Carlo samples from the target distribution with lower autocorrelation compared to non-transformed samplers, and demonstrates significant improvements in efficiency when compared to gradient-based proposals designed for parallel computer architectures, given a flexible enough diffeomorphism. Alberto Cabezas, Christopher Nemeth |
AISTATS | 1 |