VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaidev Gill
dblp:349/4531
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-7333-4161ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 71% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › contrastive loss
supervised contrastive loss |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 Engineering the Neural Collapse Geometry of Supervised-Contrastive Loss (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation geometry |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
activation function |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › activation function
ReLU |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and Batching · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unconstrained features model · 0.8normalized embeddings · 0.8fixed prototypes · 0.8contrastive loss analysis · 0.8batch selection · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Engineering the Neural Collapse Geometry of Supervised-Contrastive Loss (Student Abstract)abstractSupervised-contrastive loss (SCL) is an alternative to cross-entropy (CE) for classification tasks that makes use of similarities in the embedding space to allow for richer representations. Previous works have used trainable prototypes to help improve test accuracy of SCL when training under imbalance. In this work, we propose the use of fixed prototypes to help engineering the feature geometry when training with SCL. We gain further insights by considering a limiting scenario where the number of prototypes far outnumber the original batch size. Through this, we establish a connection to CE loss with a fixed classifier and normalized embeddings. We validate our findings by conducting a series of experiments with deep neural networks on benchmark vision datasets. Jaidev Gill, Vala Vakilian, Christos Thrampoulidis |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Engineering the Neural Collapse Geometry of Supervised-Contrastive LossabstractSupervised-contrastive loss (SCL) is an alternative to cross-entropy (CE) for classification tasks that makes use of similarities in the embedding space to allow for richer representations. In this work, we propose methods to engineer the geometry of these learnt feature embeddings by modifying the contrastive loss. In pursuit of adjusting the geometry we explore the impact of prototypes, fixed embeddings included during training to alter the final feature geometry. Specifically, through empirical findings, we demonstrate that the inclusion of prototypes in every batch induces the geometry of the learnt embeddings to align with that of the prototypes. We gain further insights by considering a limiting scenario where the number of prototypes far outnumber the original batch size. Through this, we establish a connection to cross-entropy (CE) loss with a fixed classifier and normalized embeddings. We validate our findings by conducting a series of experiments with deep neural networks on benchmark vision datasets. Jaidev Gill, Vala Vakilian, Christos Thrampoulidis |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2024 | Symmetric Neural-Collapse Representations with Supervised Contrastive Loss: The Impact of ReLU and BatchingabstractSupervised contrastive loss (SCL) is a competitive and often superior alternative to the cross-entropy loss for classification. While prior studies have demonstrated that both losses yield symmetric training representations under balanced data, this symmetry breaks under class imbalances. This paper presents an intriguing discovery: the introduction of a ReLU activation at the final layer effectively restores the symmetry in SCL-learned representations. We arrive at this finding analytically, by establishing that the global minimizers of an unconstrained features model with SCL loss and entry-wise non-negativity constraints form an orthogonal frame. Extensive experiments conducted across various datasets, architectures, and imbalance scenarios corroborate our finding. Importantly, our experiments reveal that the inclusion of the ReLU activation restores symmetry without compromising test accuracy. This constitutes the first geometry characterization of SCL under imbalances. Additionally, our analysis and experiments underscore the pivotal role of batch selection strategies in representation geometry. By proving necessary and sufficient conditions for mini-batch choices that ensure invariant symmetric representations, we introduce batch-binding as an efficient strategy that guarantees these conditions hold. Ganesh R. Kini, Vala Vakilian, Tina Behnia, Jaidev Gill, Christos Thrampoulidis |
ICLR | 4 |