Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastien Raveau

dblp:349/4963 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3760-6407ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 39% Privacy and data protection · 30% Authentication and access control · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
password guessing
0.812024
Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking: How a Third Party Can Crack Our Password Hash Without Learning the Hash Value or the Cleartext · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › hash functions
password hashing
0.812024
Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking: How a Third Party Can Crack Our Password Hash Without Learning the Hash Value or the Cleartext · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving computation
0.812024
Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking: How a Third Party Can Crack Our Password Hash Without Learning the Hash Value or the Cleartext · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › functional encryption
predicate encryption
0.212024
Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking: How a Third Party Can Crack Our Password Hash Without Learning the Hash Value or the Cleartext · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predicate encryption · 0.8decoy hashes · 0.8FPGA implementation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking: How a Third Party Can Crack Our Password Hash Without Learning the Hash Value or the Cleartext
abstract
Using the computational resources of an untrusted third party to crack a password hash can pose a high number of privacy and security risks. The act of revealing the hash digest could in itself negatively impact both the data subject who created the password, and the data controller who stores the hash digest. This paper solves this currently open problem by presenting a Privacy-Preserving Password Cracking protocol (3PC), that prevents the third party cracking server from learning any useful information about the hash digest, or the recovered cleartext. This is achieved by a tailored anonymity set of decoy hashes, based on the concept of predicate encryption, where we extend the definition of a predicate function, to evaluate the output of a one way hash function. The probabilistic information the server obtains during the cracking process can be calculated and minimized to a desired level. While in theory, cracking more hashes would introduce additional overhead, the 3PC protocol enables constant-time lookup regardless of the list size, limited by the input/output operation per second (IOPS) capabilities of the third-party server, allowing the protocol to scale efficiently. We demonstrate these claims both theoretically and in practice, with a real-life use case implemented on an FPGA architecture.
Norbert Tihanyi, Tamás Bisztray, Bertalan Borsos, Sebastien Raveau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.4