Many machine learning problems today have multiple objective functions, which are often tackled by the multi-objective learning (MOL) framework. Albeit many encouraging results are obtained by MOL algorithms, a recent theoretical study [1] revealed that these gradient-based MOL methods (e.g., MGDA, CAGrad) all reflect an inherent trade-off between optimization convergence speeds and conflict-avoidance abilities. To this end, we develop an improved stochastic variance-reduced multi-objective gradient correction method for MOL, achieving the ${\mathcal{O}}\left({{\varepsilon ^{ - 1.5}}}\right)$ sample complexity. In addition, our proposed method simultaneously improves the theoretical guarantees for conflict avoidance and convergence rate compared to prior stochastic gradient-based MOL methods in the non-convex setting. We further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method empirically using popular multi-task learning (MTL) benchmarks.

This paper studies the transfer reinforcement learning (RL) problem where multiple RL problems have different reward functions but share the same underlying transition dynamics. In this setting, the Q-function of each RL problem (task) can be decomposed into a successor feature (SF) and a reward mapping: the former characterizes the transition dynamics, and the latter characterizes the task-specific reward function. This Q-function decomposition, coupled with a policy improvement operator known as generalized policy improvement (GPI), reduces the sample complexity of finding the optimal Q-function, and thus the SF & GPI framework exhibits promising empirical performance compared to traditional RL methods like Q-learning. However, its theoretical foundations remain largely unestablished, especially when learning the successor features using deep neural networks (SF-DQN). This paper studies the provable knowledge transfer using SFs-DQN in transfer RL problems. We establish the first convergence analysis with provable generalization guarantees for SF-DQN with GPI. The theory reveals that SF-DQN with GPI outperforms conventional RL approaches, such as deep Q-network, in terms of both faster convergence rate and better generalization. Numerical experiments on real and synthetic RL tasks support the superior performance of SF-DQN & GPI, aligning with our theoretical findings.

Multi-objective learning (MOL) often arises in machine learning problems when there are multiple data modalities or tasks. One critical challenge in MOL is the potential conflict among different objectives during the optimization process. Recent works have developed various dynamic weighting algorithms for MOL, where the central idea is to find an update direction that avoids conflicts among objectives. Albeit its appealing intuition, empirical studies show that dynamic weighting methods may not outperform static ones. To understand this theory-practice gap, we focus on a stochastic variant of MGDA, the Multi-objective gradient with Double sampling (MoDo), and study the generalization performance and its interplay with optimization through the lens of algorithmic stability in the framework of statistical learning theory. We find that the key rationale behind MGDA—updating along conflict-avoidant direction—may hinder dynamic weighting algorithms from achieving the optimal $O(1/\sqrt{n})$ population risk, where $n$ is the number of training samples. We further demonstrate the impact of dynamic weights on the three-way trade-off among optimization, generalization, and conflict avoidance unique in MOL. We showcase the generality of our theoretical framework by analyzing other algorithms under the framework. Experiments on various multi-task learning benchmarks are performed to demonstrate the practical applicability. Code is available at https://github.com/heshandevaka/Trade-Off-MOL.

Multi-objective learning (MOL) often arises in emerging machine learning problems when multiple learning criteria or tasks need to be addressed. Recent works have developed various _dynamic weighting_ algorithms for MOL, including MGDA and its variants, whose central idea is to find an update direction that _avoids conflicts_ among objectives. Albeit its appealing intuition, empirical studies show that dynamic weighting methods may not always outperform static alternatives. To bridge this gap between theory and practice, we focus on a new variant of stochastic MGDA - the Multi-objective gradient with Double sampling (MoDo) algorithm and study its generalization performance and the interplay with optimization through the lens of algorithm stability. We find that the rationale behind MGDA -- updating along conflict-avoidant direction - may \emph{impede} dynamic weighting algorithms from achieving the optimal ${\cal O}(1/\sqrt{n})$ population risk, where $n$ is the number of training samples. We further highlight the variability of dynamic weights and their impact on the three-way trade-off among optimization, generalization, and conflict avoidance that is unique in MOL. Code is available at https://github.com/heshandevaka/Trade-Off-MOL.