VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenhao Mu
dblp:349/7943
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-7297-9273ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 83% Generative modeling · 8% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
inference-time alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
representation editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
stochastic dynamical systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value function · 0.8gradient-based optimization · 0.8bellman equation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | EnrichGAN: Exploiting enriched discriminator representations for training GANs under limited data
Wenhao Mu, Kai Chen 0026, Lizhuang Ma, Nan Wang 0027, Qingchao Jiang, Bingcang Huang |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2025 | Diffusion Models as Constrained Samplers for Optimization with Unknown ConstraintsabstractAddressing real-world optimization problems becomes particularly challenging when analytic objective functions or constraints are unavailable. While numerous studies have addressed the issue of unknown objectives, limited research has focused on scenarios where feasibility constraints are not given explicitly. Overlooking these constraints can lead to spurious solutions that are unrealistic in practice. To deal with such unknown constraints, we propose to perform optimization within the data manifold using diffusion models. To constrain the optimization process to the data manifold, we reformulate the original optimization problem as a sampling problem from the product of the Boltzmann distribution defined by the objective function and the data distribution learned by the diffusion model. Depending on the differentiability of the objective function, we propose two different sampling methods. For differentiable objectives, we propose a two-stage framework that begins with a guided diffusion process for warm-up, followed by a Langevin dynamics stage for further correction. For non-differentiable objectives, we propose an iterative importance sampling strategy using the diffusion model as the proposal distribution. Comprehensive experiments on a synthetic dataset, six real-world black-box optimization datasets, and a multi-objective molecule optimization dataset show that our method achieves better or comparable performance with previous state-of-the-art baselines. Yuanqi Du, Wenhao Mu, Kirill Neklyudov, Valentin De Bortoli, Dongxia Wu, Haorui Wang, Aaron M. Ferber, Yi-An Ma, Carla P. Gomes, Chao Zhang 0014 |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2025 | DF2: Distribution-Free Decision-Focused LearningabstractDecision-focused learning (DFL), which differentiates through the KKT conditions, has recently emerged as a powerful approach for predict-then-optimize problems. However, under probabilistic settings, DFL faces three major bottlenecks: model mismatch error, sample average approximation error, and gradient approximation error. Model mismatch error stems from the misalignment between the model’s parameterized predictive distribution and the true probability distribution. Sample average approximation error arises when using finite samples to approximate the expected optimization objective. Gradient approximation error occurs when the objectives are non-convex and KKT conditions cannot be directly applied. In this paper, we present DF$^2$-the first \textit{distribution-free} decision-focused learning method designed to mitigate these three bottlenecks. Rather than depending on a task-specific forecaster that requires precise model assumptions, our method directly learns the expected optimization function during training. To efficiently learn the function in a data-driven manner, we devise an attention-based model architecture inspired by the distribution-based parameterization of the expected objective. We evaluate DF$^2$ on two synthetic problems and three real-world problems, demonstrating the effectiveness of DF$^2$. Our code can be found at: https://github.com/Lingkai-Kong/DF2. Wenhao Mu, Jiaming Cui, Yuchen Zhuang, B. Aditya Prakash, Bo Dai 0001, Chao Zhang 0014 |
UAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Two Birds with One Stone: Enhancing Uncertainty Quantification and Interpretability with Graph Functional Neural ProcessabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools on graph data. However, their predictions are mis-calibrated and lack interpretability, limiting their adoption in critical applications. To address this issue, we propose a new uncertainty-aware and interpretable graph classification model that combines graph functional neural process and graph generative model. The core of our method is to assume a set of latent rationales which can be mapped to a probabilistic embedding space; the predictive distribution of the classifier is conditioned on such rationale embeddings by learning a stochastic correlation matrix. The graph generator serves to decode the graph structure of the rationales from the embedding space for model interpretability. For efficient model training, we adopt an alternating optimization procedure which mimics the well known Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. The proposed method is general and can be applied to any existing GNN architecture. Extensive experiments on five graph classification datasets demonstrate that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both uncertainty quantification and GNN interpretability. We also conduct case studies to show that the decoded rationale structure can provide meaningful explanations. Yuchen Zhuang, Haorui Wang, Wenhao Mu, Chao Zhang 0014 |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2024 | Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control PerspectiveabstractAligning large language models (LLMs) with human objectives is crucial for real-world applications. However, fine-tuning LLMs for alignment often suffers from unstable training and requires substantial computing resources. Test-time alignment techniques, such as prompting and guided decoding, do not modify the underlying model, and their performance remains dependent on the original model's capabilities. To address these challenges, we propose aligning LLMs through representation editing. The core of our method is to view a pre-trained autoregressive LLM as a discrete-time stochastic dynamical system. To achieve alignment for specific objectives, we introduce external control signals into the state space of this language dynamical system. We train a value function directly on the hidden states according to the Bellman equation, enabling gradient-based optimization to obtain the optimal control signals at test time. Our experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms existing test-time alignment techniques while requiring significantly fewer resources compared to fine-tuning methods. Our code is available at [https://github.com/Lingkai-Kong/RE-Control](https://github.com/Lingkai-Kong/RE-Control). Haorui Wang, Wenhao Mu, Yuanqi Du, Yuchen Zhuang, Rongzhi Zhang, Kai Wang 0036, Chao Zhang 0014 |
NeurIPS | 3 |