Ross W. Filice

dblp:35/10452 · also Ross Warren Filice · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-1142-3338ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 73% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 27%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.822020
Attend to Medical Ontologies: Content Selection for Clinical Abstractive Summarization · ACL 2020
Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization · SIGIR 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection
0.412020
Attend to Medical Ontologies: Content Selection for Clinical Abstractive Summarization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.412020
Attend to Medical Ontologies: Content Selection for Clinical Abstractive Summarization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › biomedical summarization
clinical summarization
0.412019
Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization · SIGIR 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
domain ontology
0.412019
Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization · SIGIR 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.412019
Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization · SIGIR 2019
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical report processing
0.112019
Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization · SIGIR 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence-to-sequence · 1.6attention mechanism · 0.9ontology augmentation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Attend to Medical Ontologies: Content Selection for Clinical Abstractive Summarization
abstract
Sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) network is a well-established model for text summarization task.It can learn to produce readable content; however, it falls short in effectively identifying key regions of the source.In this paper, we approach the content selection problem for clinical abstractive summarization by augmenting salient ontological terms into the summarizer.Our experiments on two publicly available clinical data sets (107,372 reports of MIMIC-CXR, and 3,366 reports of OpenI) show that our model statistically significantly boosts state-of-the-art results in terms of ROUGE metrics (with improvements: 2.9% RG-1, 2.5% RG-2, 1.9% RG-L), in the healthcare domain where any range of improvement impacts patients' welfare.
Sajad Sotudeh Gharebagh, Nazli Goharian, Ross W. Filice
ACL3
2020 Ranking Significant Discrepancies in Clinical Reports
Sean MacAvaney, Arman Cohan, Nazli Goharian, Ross W. Filice
ECIR (2)4
2019 Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarization
abstract
Automatically generating accurate summaries from clinical reports could save a clinician's time, improve summary coverage, and reduce errors. We propose a sequence-to-sequence abstractive summarization model augmented with domain-specific ontological information to enhance content selection and summary generation. We apply our method to a dataset of radiology reports and show that it significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art on this task in terms of rouge scores. Extensive human evaluation conducted by a radiologist further indicates that this approach yields summaries that are less likely to omit important details, without sacrificing readability or accuracy.
Sean MacAvaney, Sajad Sotudeh, Arman Cohan, Nazli Goharian, Ish A. Talati, Ross W. Filice
SIGIR6
2019 Integrating ontologies of human diseases, phenotypes, and radiological diagnosis
abstract
Mappings between ontologies enable reuse and interoperability of biomedical knowledge. The Radiology Gamuts Ontology (RGO)-an ontology of 16 918 diseases, interventions, and imaging observations-provides a resource for differential diagnosis and automated textual report understanding in radiology. An automated process with subsequent manual review was used to identify exact and partial matches of RGO entities to the Disease Ontology (DO) and the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). Exact mappings identified equivalent concepts; partial mappings identified subclass and superclass relationships. A total of 7913 distinct RGO entities (46.8%) were mapped to one or both of the two target ontologies. Integration of RGO's causal knowledge resulted in 9605 axioms that expressed direct causal relationships between DO diseases and HPO phenotypic abnormalities, and allowed one to formulate queries about causal relations using the abstraction properties in those two ontologies. The mappings can be used to support automated diagnostic reasoning, data mining, and knowledge discovery.
Michael T. Finke, Ross W. Filice, Charles E. Kahn Jr.
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.2
2016 Use of data mining at the Food and Drug Administration
abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes past and current data mining activities at the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). TARGET AUDIENCE: We address data miners in all sectors, anyone interested in the safety of products regulated by the FDA (predominantly medical products, food, veterinary products and nutrition, and tobacco products), and those interested in FDA activities. SCOPE: Topics include routine and developmental data mining activities, short descriptions of mined FDA data, advantages and challenges of data mining at the FDA, and future directions of data mining at the FDA.
Hesha J. Duggirala, Joseph M. Tonning, Ella Smith, Roselie A. Bright, John D. Baker, Robert Ball, Carlos Bell, Susan J. Bright-Ponte, Taxiarchis Botsis, Khaled Bouri, Marc Boyer, Keith Burkhart, G. Steven Condrey, James J. Chen, Stuart Chirtel, Ross W. Filice, Henry Francis, Hongying Jiang, Jonathan Levine, Taiye Oladipo, Rene O'Neill, Lee Anne M. Palmer, Antonio Paredes, George Rochester, Deborah Sholtes, Ana Szarfman, Hui-Lee Wong, Zhiheng Xu, Taha A. Kass-Hout
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.16