Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric W. Deutsch

dblp:35/1782 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8732-0928ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Knowledge graphs · 83% Database theory · 10% Query processing and optimization · 8%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
biomedical knowledge graph
1.522025
PloverDB: a high-performance platform for serving biomedical knowledge graphs as standards-compliant web APIs · Bioinform. 2025
ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine · Bioinform. 2023
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph reasoning
0.712023
ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine · Bioinform. 2023
Database theory
query answering
0.312025
PloverDB: a high-performance platform for serving biomedical knowledge graphs as standards-compliant web APIs · Bioinform. 2025
Query processing and optimization
query planning
0.212023
ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

entity resolution · 0.9result ranking · 0.7knowledge federation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PloverDB: a high-performance platform for serving biomedical knowledge graphs as standards-compliant web APIs
abstract
SUMMARY: Knowledge graphs are increasingly being used to integrate heterogeneous biomedical knowledge and data. General-purpose graph database management systems such as Neo4j are often used to host and search knowledge graphs, but such tools come with overhead and leave biomedical-specific standards compliance and reasoning to the user. Interoperability across biomedical knowledge bases and reasoning systems necessitates the use of standards such as those adopted by the Biomedical Data Translator consortium. We present PloverDB, a comprehensive software platform for hosting and efficiently serving biomedical knowledge graphs as standards-compliant web application programming interfaces. In addition to fundamental back-end knowledge reasoning tasks, PloverDB automatically handles entity resolution, exposure of standardized metadata and test data, and multiplexing of knowledge graphs, all in a single platform designed specifically for efficient query answering and ease of deployment. PloverDB increases data accessibility and utility by allowing data providers to quickly serve their biomedical knowledge graphs as standards-compliant web services. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PloverDB's source code and technical documentation are publicly available under an MIT License at github:RTXteam/PloverDB, archived on Zenodo at doi:10.5281/zenodo.15454600.
Amy Glen, Eric W. Deutsch, Stephen A. Ramsey
Bioinform.2
2023 ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine
abstract
MOTIVATION: With the rapidly growing volume of knowledge and data in biomedical databases, improved methods for knowledge-graph-based computational reasoning are needed in order to answer translational questions. Previous efforts to solve such challenging computational reasoning problems have contributed tools and approaches, but progress has been hindered by the lack of an expressive analysis workflow language for translational reasoning and by the lack of a reasoning engine-supporting that language-that federates semantically integrated knowledge-bases. RESULTS: We introduce ARAX, a new reasoning system for translational biomedicine that provides a web browser user interface and an application programming interface (API). ARAX enables users to encode translational biomedical questions and to integrate knowledge across sources to answer the user's query and facilitate exploration of results. For ARAX, we developed new approaches to query planning, knowledge-gathering, reasoning and result ranking and dynamically integrate knowledge providers for answering biomedical questions. To illustrate ARAX's application and utility in specific disease contexts, we present several use-case examples. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and technical documentation for building the ARAX server-side software and its built-in knowledge database are freely available online (https://github.com/RTXteam/RTX). We provide a hosted ARAX service with a web browser interface at arax.rtx.ai and a web API endpoint at arax.rtx.ai/api/arax/v1.3/ui/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Amy Glen, Chunyu Ma, Luis Mendoza, Finn Womack, E. C. Wood, Meghamala Sinha, Liliana Acevedo, Lindsey G. Kvarfordt, Ross C. Peene, Andrew S. Hoffman, Jared C. Roach, Eric W. Deutsch, Stephen A. Ramsey, David Koslicki
Bioinform.13
2022 RTX-KG2: a system for building a semantically standardized knowledge graph for translational biomedicine
abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomedical translational science is increasingly using computational reasoning on repositories of structured knowledge (such as UMLS, SemMedDB, ChEMBL, Reactome, DrugBank, and SMPDB in order to facilitate discovery of new therapeutic targets and modalities. The NCATS Biomedical Data Translator project is working to federate autonomous reasoning agents and knowledge providers within a distributed system for answering translational questions. Within that project and the broader field, there is a need for a framework that can efficiently and reproducibly build an integrated, standards-compliant, and comprehensive biomedical knowledge graph that can be downloaded in standard serialized form or queried via a public application programming interface (API). RESULTS: To create a knowledge provider system within the Translator project, we have developed RTX-KG2, an open-source software system for building-and hosting a web API for querying-a biomedical knowledge graph that uses an Extract-Transform-Load approach to integrate 70 knowledge sources (including the aforementioned core six sources) into a knowledge graph with provenance information including (where available) citations. The semantic layer and schema for RTX-KG2 follow the standard Biolink model to maximize interoperability. RTX-KG2 is currently being used by multiple Translator reasoning agents, both in its downloadable form and via its SmartAPI-registered interface. Serializations of RTX-KG2 are available for download in both the pre-canonicalized form and in canonicalized form (in which synonyms are merged). The current canonicalized version (KG2.7.3) of RTX-KG2 contains 6.4M nodes and 39.3M edges with a hierarchy of 77 relationship types from Biolink. CONCLUSION: RTX-KG2 is the first knowledge graph that integrates UMLS, SemMedDB, ChEMBL, DrugBank, Reactome, SMPDB, and 64 additional knowledge sources within a knowledge graph that conforms to the Biolink standard for its semantic layer and schema. RTX-KG2 is publicly available for querying via its API at arax.rtx.ai/api/rtxkg2/v1.2/openapi.json . The code to build RTX-KG2 is publicly available at github:RTXteam/RTX-KG2 .
E. C. Wood, Amy Glen, Lindsey G. Kvarfordt, Finn Womack, Liliana Acevedo, Timothy S. Yoon, Chunyu Ma, Veronica Flores, Meghamala Sinha, Yodsawalai Chodpathumwan, Arash Termehchy, Jared C. Roach, Luis Mendoza, Andrew S. Hoffman, Eric W. Deutsch, David Koslicki, Stephen A. Ramsey
BMC Bioinform.15
2016 I'll take that to go: Big data bags and minimal identifiers for exchange of large, complex datasets
abstract
Big data workflows often require the assembly and exchange of complex, multi-element datasets. For example, in biomedical applications, the input to an analytic pipeline can be a dataset consisting thousands of images and genome sequences assembled from diverse repositories, requiring a description of the contents of the dataset in a concise and unambiguous form. Typical approaches to creating datasets for big data workflows assume that all data reside in a single location, requiring costly data marshaling and permitting errors of omission and commission because dataset members are not explicitly specified. We address these issues by proposing simple methods and tools for assembling, sharing, and analyzing large and complex datasets that scientists can easily integrate into their daily workflows. These tools combine a simple and robust method for describing data collections (BDBags), data descriptions (Research Objects), and simple persistent identifiers (Minids) to create a powerful ecosystem of tools and services for big data analysis and sharing. We present these tools and use biomedical case studies to illustrate their use for the rapid assembly, sharing, and analysis of large datasets.
Kyle Chard, Mike D'Arcy, Benjamin D. Heavner, Ian T. Foster, Carl Kesselman, Ravi K. Madduri, Alexis A. Rodriguez, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Carole A. Goble, Kristi Clark, Eric W. Deutsch, Ivo D. Dinov, Nathan D. Price 0001, Arthur W. Toga
IEEE BigData11
2015 Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the goals of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization, the methods that the PSI has employed to create data standards, the resulting output of the PSI, lessons learned from the PSI's evolution, and future directions and synergies for the group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PSI has 5 categories of deliverables that have guided the group. These are minimum information guidelines, data formats, controlled vocabularies, resources and software tools, and dissemination activities. These deliverables are produced via the leadership and working group organization of the initiative, driven by frequent workshops and ongoing communication within the working groups. Official standards are subjected to a rigorous document process that includes several levels of peer review prior to release. RESULTS: We have produced and published minimum information guidelines describing what information should be provided when making data public, either via public repositories or other means. The PSI has produced a series of standard formats covering mass spectrometer input, mass spectrometer output, results of informatics analysis (both qualitative and quantitative analyses), reports of molecular interaction data, and gel electrophoresis analyses. We have produced controlled vocabularies that ensure that concepts are uniformly annotated in the formats and engaged in extensive software development and dissemination efforts so that the standards can efficiently be used by the community.Conclusion In its first dozen years of operation, the PSI has produced many standards that have accelerated the field of proteomics by facilitating data exchange and deposition to data repositories. We look to the future to continue developing standards for new proteomics technologies and workflows and mechanisms for integration with other omics data types. Our products facilitate the translation of genomics and proteomics findings to clinical and biological phenotypes. The PSI website can be accessed at http://www.psidev.info.
Eric W. Deutsch, Juan P. Albar, Pierre-Alain Binz, Martin Eisenacher, Andrew R. Jones, Gerhard Mayer, Gilbert S. Omenn, Sandra E. Orchard, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Henning Hermjakob
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.1
2015 Big biomedical data as the key resource for discovery science
abstract
Modern biomedical data collection is generating exponentially more data in a multitude of formats. This flood of complex data poses significant opportunities to discover and understand the critical interplay among such diverse domains as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics, including imaging, biometrics, and clinical data. The Big Data for Discovery Science Center is taking an "-ome to home" approach to discover linkages between these disparate data sources by mining existing databases of proteomic and genomic data, brain images, and clinical assessments. In support of this work, the authors developed new technological capabilities that make it easy for researchers to manage, aggregate, manipulate, integrate, and model large amounts of distributed data. Guided by biological domain expertise, the Center's computational resources and software will reveal relationships and patterns, aiding researchers in identifying biomarkers for the most confounding conditions and diseases, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.
Arthur W. Toga, Ian T. Foster, Carl Kesselman, Ravi K. Madduri, Kyle Chard, Eric W. Deutsch, Nathan D. Price 0001, Gwênlyn Glusman, Benjamin D. Heavner, Ivo D. Dinov, Joseph Ames, John D. Van Horn, Roger Kramer, Leroy E. Hood
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.6
2012 Interfaces to PeptideAtlas: a case study of standard data access systems
abstract
Access to public data sets is important to the scientific community as a resource to develop new experiments or validate new data. Projects such as the PeptideAtlas, Ensembl and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) offer both access to public data and a repository to share their own data. Access to these data sets is often provided through a web page form and a web service API. Access technologies based on web protocols (e.g. http) have been in use for over a decade and are widely adopted across the industry for a variety of functions (e.g. search, commercial transactions, and social media). Each architecture adapts these technologies to provide users with tools to access and share data. Both commonly used web service technologies (e.g. REST and SOAP), and custom-built solutions over HTTP are utilized in providing access to research data. Providing multiple access points ensures that the community can access the data in the simplest and most effective manner for their particular needs. This article examines three common access mechanisms for web accessible data: BioMart, caBIG, and Google Data Sources. These are illustrated by implementing each over the PeptideAtlas repository and reviewed for their suitability based on specific usages common to research. BioMart, Google Data Sources, and caBIG are each suitable for certain uses. The tradeoffs made in the development of the technology are dependent on the uses each was designed for (e.g. security versus speed). This means that an understanding of specific requirements and tradeoffs is necessary before selecting the access technology.
Sarah A. Killcoyne, Jeremy Handcock, Thomas Robinson, Eric W. Deutsch, John Boyle
Briefings Bioinform.4
2012 Hydra: a scalable proteomic search engine which utilizes the Hadoop distributed computing framework
abstract
BACKGROUND: For shotgun mass spectrometry based proteomics the most computationally expensive step is in matching the spectra against an increasingly large database of sequences and their post-translational modifications with known masses. Each mass spectrometer can generate data at an astonishingly high rate, and the scope of what is searched for is continually increasing. Therefore solutions for improving our ability to perform these searches are needed. RESULTS: We present a sequence database search engine that is specifically designed to run efficiently on the Hadoop MapReduce distributed computing framework. The search engine implements the K-score algorithm, generating comparable output for the same input files as the original implementation. The scalability of the system is shown, and the architecture required for the development of such distributed processing is discussed. CONCLUSION: The software is scalable in its ability to handle a large peptide database, numerous modifications and large numbers of spectra. Performance scales with the number of processors in the cluster, allowing throughput to expand with the available resources.
Steven Lewis, Attila Csordas, Sarah A. Killcoyne, Henning Hermjakob, Michael R. Hoopmann, Robert L. Moritz, Eric W. Deutsch, John Boyle
BMC Bioinform.7
2011 ATAQS: A computational software tool for high throughput transition optimization and validation for selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry
abstract
BACKGROUND: Since its inception, proteomics has essentially operated in a discovery mode with the goal of identifying and quantifying the maximal number of proteins in a sample. Increasingly, proteomic measurements are also supporting hypothesis-driven studies, in which a predetermined set of proteins is consistently detected and quantified in multiple samples. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is a targeted mass spectrometric technique that supports the detection and quantification of specific proteins in complex samples at high sensitivity and reproducibility. Here, we describe ATAQS, an integrated software platform that supports all stages of targeted, SRM-based proteomics experiments including target selection, transition optimization and post acquisition data analysis. This software will significantly facilitate the use of targeted proteomic techniques and contribute to the generation of highly sensitive, reproducible and complete datasets that are particularly critical for the discovery and validation of targets in hypothesis-driven studies in systems biology. RESULT: We introduce a new open source software pipeline, ATAQS (Automated and Targeted Analysis with Quantitative SRM), which consists of a number of modules that collectively support the SRM assay development workflow for targeted proteomic experiments (project management and generation of protein, peptide and transitions and the validation of peptide detection by SRM). ATAQS provides a flexible pipeline for end-users by allowing the workflow to start or end at any point of the pipeline, and for computational biologists, by enabling the easy extension of java algorithm classes for their own algorithm plug-in or connection via an external web site.This integrated system supports all steps in a SRM-based experiment and provides a user-friendly GUI that can be run by any operating system that allows the installation of the Mozilla Firefox web browser. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted proteomics via SRM is a powerful new technique that enables the reproducible and accurate identification and quantification of sets of proteins of interest. ATAQS is the first open-source software that supports all steps of the targeted proteomics workflow. ATAQS also provides software API (Application Program Interface) documentation that enables the addition of new algorithms to each of the workflow steps. The software, installation guide and sample dataset can be found in http://tools.proteomecenter.org/ATAQS/ATAQS.html.
Mi-Youn K. Brusniak, Sung-Tat Kwok, Mark Christiansen, David S. Campbell, Lukas Reiter, Paola Picotti, Ulrike Kusebauch, Hector Ramos, Eric W. Deutsch, Jingchun Chen, Robert L. Moritz, Ruedi Aebersold
BMC Bioinform.9
2009 The Drosophila melanogaster PeptideAtlas facilitates the use of peptide data for improved fly proteomics and genome annotation
abstract
BACKGROUND: Crucial foundations of any quantitative systems biology experiment are correct genome and proteome annotations. Protein databases compiled from high quality empirical protein identifications that are in turn based on correct gene models increase the correctness, sensitivity, and quantitative accuracy of systems biology genome-scale experiments. RESULTS: In this manuscript, we present the Drosophila melanogaster PeptideAtlas, a fly proteomics and genomics resource of unsurpassed depth. Based on peptide mass spectrometry data collected in our laboratory the portal http://www.drosophila-peptideatlas.org allows querying fly protein data observed with respect to gene model confirmation and splice site verification as well as for the identification of proteotypic peptides suited for targeted proteomics studies. Additionally, the database provides consensus mass spectra for observed peptides along with qualitative and quantitative information about the number of observations of a particular peptide and the sample(s) in which it was observed. CONCLUSION: PeptideAtlas is an open access database for the Drosophila community that has several features and applications that support (1) reduction of the complexity inherently associated with performing targeted proteomic studies, (2) designing and accelerating shotgun proteomics experiments, (3) confirming or questioning gene models, and (4) adjusting gene models such that they are in line with observed Drosophila peptides. While the database consists of proteomic data it is not required that the user is a proteomics expert.
Sandra N. Loevenich, Erich Brunner, Nichole L. King, Eric W. Deutsch, Stephen E. Stein, Ruedi Aebersold, Ernst Hafen
BMC Bioinform.4
2006 SBEAMS-Microarray: database software supporting genomic expression analyses for systems biology
abstract
BACKGROUND: The biological information in genomic expression data can be understood, and computationally extracted, in the context of systems of interacting molecules. The automation of this information extraction requires high throughput management and analysis of genomic expression data, and integration of these data with other data types. RESULTS: SBEAMS-Microarray, a module of the open-source Systems Biology Experiment Analysis Management System (SBEAMS), enables MIAME-compliant storage, management, analysis, and integration of high-throughput genomic expression data. It is interoperable with the Cytoscape network integration, visualization, analysis, and modeling software platform. CONCLUSION: SBEAMS-Microarray provides end-to-end support for genomic expression analyses for network-based systems biology research.
Bruz Marzolf, Eric W. Deutsch, Patrick Moss, David S. Campbell, Michael H. Johnson, Timothy Galitski
BMC Bioinform.2