Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frederick R. Blattner

dblp:35/239 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence assembly
0.131999
Neural network input representations that produce accurate consensus sequences from DNA fragment assemblies · Bioinform. 1999
Increasing Consensus Accuracy in DNA Fragment Assemblies by Incorporating Fluorescent Trace Representations · ISMB 1997
Improving the Quality of Automatic DNA Sequence Assembly Using Fluorescent Trace-Data Classifications · ISMB 1996
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.012004
GRIL: genome rearrangement and inversion locator · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
genome rearrangement
0.012004
GRIL: genome rearrangement and inversion locator · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment › genome alignment
multiple genome alignment
0.012004
GRIL: genome rearrangement and inversion locator · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.012004
GRIL: genome rearrangement and inversion locator · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

collinearity detection · 0.0neural network · 0.0cross-validation · 0.0fluorescent trace representation · 0.0fluorescent trace-data classification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 GRIL: genome rearrangement and inversion locator
abstract
Abstract Summary: GRIL is a tool to automatically identify collinear regions in a set of bacterial-size genome sequences. GRIL uses three basic steps. First, regions of high sequence identity are located. Second, some of these regions are filtered based on user-specified criteria. Finally, the remaining regions of sequence identity are used to define significant collinear regions among the sequences. By locating collinear regions of sequence, GRIL provides a basis for multiple genome alignment using current alignment systems. GRIL also provides a basis for using current inversion distance tools to infer phylogeny. Availability: GRIL is implemented in C++ and runs on any x86-based Linux or Windows platform. It is available from http://asap.ahabs.wisc.edu/gril Supplementary information: The GRIL web site contains a detailed description of the GRIL's algorithms, an example of applying GRIL to five genomes, and verification of the correctness of the results.
Aaron E. Darling, Bob Mau, Frederick R. Blattner, Nicole T. Perna
Bioinform.3
2002 Interpreting microarray expression data using text annotating the genes
Michael Molla, Peter Andreae, Jeremy D. Glasner, Frederick R. Blattner, Jude W. Shavlik
Inf. Sci.4
1999 Neural network input representations that produce accurate consensus sequences from DNA fragment assemblies
abstract
MOTIVATION: Given inputs extracted from an aligned column of DNA bases and the underlying Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems (ABI) fluorescent traces, our goal is to train a neural network to determine correctly the consensus base for the column. Choosing an appropriate network input representation is critical to success in this task. We empirically compare five representations; one uses only base calls and the others include trace information. RESULTS: We attained the most accurate results from networks that incorporate trace information into their input representations. Based on estimates derived from using 10-fold cross-validation, the best network topology produces consensus accuracies ranging from 99.26% to >99.98% for coverages from two to six aligned sequences. With a coverage of six, it makes only three errors in 20 000 consensus calls. In contrast, the network that only uses base calls in its input representation has over double that error rate: eight errors in 20 000 consensus calls. CONTACT: [email protected]
Carolyn F. Allex, Jude W. Shavlik, Frederick R. Blattner
Bioinform.3
1997 Increasing Consensus Accuracy in DNA Fragment Assemblies by Incorporating Fluorescent Trace Representations
Carolyn F. Allex, Schuyler F. Baldwin, Jude W. Shavlik, Frederick R. Blattner
ISMB4
1996 Improving the Quality of Automatic DNA Sequence Assembly Using Fluorescent Trace-Data Classifications
Carolyn F. Allex, Schuyler F. Baldwin, Jude W. Shavlik, Frederick R. Blattner
ISMB4