Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steven Adams
dblp:35/5634
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Learning theory · 25% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
gaussian process approximation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory
neural network approximation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
prior selection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic Programming · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic Programming · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic Programming · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic Programming · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
neural network uncertainty |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein distance · 1.0optimal transport · 1.0gaussian process · 1.0bayesian inference · 1.0dynamic programming · 0.7convex relaxation · 0.7bound propagation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior SelectionabstractInfinitely wide or deep neural networks (NNs) with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) parameters have been shown to be equivalent to Gaussian processes. Because of the favorable properties of Gaussian processes, this equivalence is commonly employed to analyze neural networks and has led to various breakthroughs over the years. However, neural networks and Gaussian processes are equivalent only in the limit; in the finite case there are currently no methods available to approximate a trained neural network with a Gaussian model with bounds on the approximation error. In this work, we present an algorithmic framework to approximate a neural network of finite width and depth, and with not necessarily i.i.d. parameters, with a mixture of Gaussian processes with bounds on the approximation error. In particular, we consider the Wasserstein distance to quantify the closeness between probabilistic models and, by relying on tools from optimal transport and Gaussian processes, we iteratively approximate the output distribution of each layer of the neural network as a mixture of Gaussian processes. Crucially, for any NN and $\epsilon >0$ our approach is able to return a mixture of Gaussian processes that is $\epsilon$-close to the NN at a finite set of input points. Furthermore, we rely on the differentiability of the resulting error bound to show how our approach can be employed to tune the parameters of a NN to mimic the functional behavior of a given Gaussian process, e.g., for prior selection in the context of Bayesian inference. We empirically investigate the effectiveness of our results on both regression and classification problems with various neural network architectures. Our experiments highlight how our results can represent an important step towards understanding neural network predictions and formally quantifying their uncertainty. Steven Adams, Andrea Patanè, Morteza Lahijanian, Luca Laurenti |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | BNN-DP: Robustness Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks via Dynamic ProgrammingabstractIn this paper, we introduce BNN-DP, an efficient algorithmic framework for analysis of adversarial robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Given a compact set of input points $T\subset \mathbb{R}^n$, BNN-DP computes lower and upper bounds on the BNN's predictions for all the points in $T$. The framework is based on an interpretation of BNNs as stochastic dynamical systems, which enables the use of Dynamic Programming (DP) algorithms to bound the prediction range along the layers of the network. Specifically, the method uses bound propagation techniques and convex relaxations to derive a backward recursion procedure to over-approximate the prediction range of the BNN with piecewise affine functions. The algorithm is general and can handle both regression and classification tasks. On a set of experiments on various regression and classification tasks and BNN architectures, we show that BNN-DP outperforms state-of-the-art methods by up to four orders of magnitude in both tightness of the bounds and computational efficiency. Steven Adams, Andrea Patanè, Morteza Lahijanian, Luca Laurenti |
ICML | 1 |