Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Armin Jahanpanah
dblp:35/6458
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Software-defined and programmable networks · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software-defined and programmable networks
network function virtualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Enabling dynamic network processing with clickOS · SIGCOMM 2012 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › network virtualization
virtual network functions |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Enabling dynamic network processing with clickOS · SIGCOMM 2012 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Experiences with large-scale operational trials of ALTO-enhanced P2P filesharing in an intra-ISP scenario
Mischa Schmidt, Jan Seedorf, Stefano Napolitano, Rosario Giuseppe Garroppo, Andrea Cavaliere, Thilo Ewald, Armin Jahanpanah, Zbigniew Kopertowski, Marcin Pilarski, Pawel Grochocki |
Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. | 7 |
| 2012 | Enabling dynamic network processing with clickOSabstractNo abstract available. Mohamed Ahmed 0001, Felipe Huici, Armin Jahanpanah |
SIGCOMM | 3 |
| 2008 | User-Land Work Stealing Schedulers: Towards a StandardabstractMulticore processors are currently hitting the market at enormous speed. Multi-processing in all its variants is seen as the way into the future of computational systems and imply parallelism for future applications. The basics of software development are changing when going parallel. One key concept to ensure scalability of today's applications for the future is the idea of using work stealing scheduling systems to ensure load balancing, and re-writing existing software is necessary to exploit that style of programming. The numerous work stealing concepts however differ in form of implementation, interfaces and supported systems. Handling this diversity of systems makes the already complicated process of going parallel even worse. We present a simple but complete work stealing scheduler (TPI - Task Processing Interface) as an example and formulate the requirements to a basic work stealing interface as a first step to an open standard proposal. Jörg Wagner 0003, Armin Jahanpanah, Jesper Larsson Träff |
CISIS | 2 |