Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timo Oksanen

dblp:35/7946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7006-6027ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Time series and sequential data · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
fault detection and diagnosis
0.912025
Fault Management System for the Safety of Perception Systems in Highly Automated Agricultural Machines · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Fault Management System for the Safety of Perception Systems in Highly Automated Agricultural Machines · ICRA 2025
Environmental and earth informatics › agriculture
agricultural automation
0.312025
Fault Management System for the Safety of Perception Systems in Highly Automated Agricultural Machines · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object detection · 1.7image quality safety model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Tractor-Sensor-Independent Real-Time State Estimation for Agricultural Trailers
Ruben Hefele, Timo Oksanen
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng.2
2025 Fault Management System for the Safety of Perception Systems in Highly Automated Agricultural Machines
abstract
Safe and reliable environmental perception is crucial for the highly automated or even autonomous operation of agriculture machines. However, developing such a system is challenging due to imperfect perception sensors. This article proposes a fault management system (FMS) for detecting, diagnosing, and mitigating risks that compromise the safety and reliability of perception systems. This article aims to develop an improved image quality safety model (IQSM) for the FMS to detect and diagnose the causes of performance insufficiencies in object detection. The IQSM exhibits remarkable performance, achieving an accuracy of about 98%, demonstrating its ability to effectively identify performance insufficiencies under pre-defined hazardous scenarios.
Changjoo Lee, Simon Schätzle, Stefan Andreas Lang, Michael Maier, Timo Oksanen
ICRA5
2024 Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Headland Turns
Lukas Pindl, Riikka Soitinaho, Patrick Behr, Timo Oksanen
ICINCO (1)4
2016 Aggregating OPC UA servers for monitoring manufacturing systems and mobile work machines
abstract
An aggregating server providing data access to multiple data sources is a software architecture that is often applied in industrial applications. This paper presents a design of an aggregating server based on OPC UA technology and tests it with two different experimental applications, one about production control of a flexible manufacturing system and another about remote monitoring of mobile work machines. The presented design enables transparent access to the data in the address space of the aggregating server through utilization of address space transformations. The transformations can be either configured with rules or be programmed. Feasibility of the design of the aggregating server and the applications was evaluated with experimental implementations containing both simulated devices and real work machines.
Ilkka Seilonen, Tomi Tuovinen, Joona Elovaara, Ian Tuomi, Timo Oksanen
ETFA5