VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei Giurgiu
dblp:35/8372
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 30% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 60% Information theory · 20% Automated reasoning and model checking · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
adapter modules |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
parameter-efficient transfer learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Information theory
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three Applications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
interpolation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three Applications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three Applications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Coding theory
spatial coupling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three Applications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › LDPC codes
threshold saturation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three Applications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Computing in social networks · Inf. Comput. 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 0.4adapter modules · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPabstractFine-tuning large pretrained models is an effective transfer mechanism in NLP. However, in the presence of many downstream tasks, fine-tuning is parameter inefficient: an entire new model is required for every task. As an alternative, we propose transfer with adapter modules. Adapter modules yield a compact and extensible model; they add only a few trainable parameters per task, and new tasks can be added without revisiting previous ones. The parameters of the original network remain fixed, yielding a high degree of parameter sharing. To demonstrate adapter’s effectiveness, we transfer the recently proposed BERT Transformer model to $26$ diverse text classification tasks, including the GLUE benchmark. Adapters attain near state-of-the-art performance, whilst adding only a few parameters per task. On GLUE, we attain within $0.8%$ of the performance of full fine-tuning, adding only $3.6%$ parameters per task. By contrast, fine-tuning trains $100%$ of the parameters per task. Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin de Laroussilhe, Andrea Gesmundo, Mona Attariyan, Sylvain Gelly |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Spatial Coupling as a Proof Technique and Three ApplicationsabstractThe aim of this paper is to show that spatial coupling can be viewed not only as a means to build better graphical models, but also as a tool to better understand uncoupled models. The starting point is the observation that some asymptotic properties of graphical models are easier to prove in the case of spatial coupling. In such cases, one can then use the so-called interpolation method to transfer known results for the spatially coupled case to the uncoupled one. Our main use of this framework is for Low-density parity check (LDPC) codes, where we use interpolation to show that the average entropy of the codeword conditioned on the observation is asymptotically the same for spatially coupled as for uncoupled ensembles. We give three applications of this result for a large class of LDPC ensembles. The first one is a proof of the so-called Maxwell construction stating that the MAP threshold is equal to the area threshold of the BP GEXIT curve. The second is a proof of the equality between the BP and MAP GEXIT curves above the MAP threshold. The third application is the intimately related fact that the replica symmetric formula for the conditional entropy in the infinite block length limit is exact. Andrei Giurgiu, Nicolas Macris, Rüdiger L. Urbanke |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2014 | Computing in social networks
Andrei Giurgiu, Rachid Guerraoui, Kévin Huguenin, Anne-Marie Kermarrec |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 2013 | And now to something completely different: Spatial coupling as a proof techniqueabstractThe aim of this paper is to show that spatial coupling can be viewed not only as a means to build better graphical models, but also as a tool to better understand uncoupled models. The starting point is the observation that some asymptotic properties of graphical models are easier to prove in the case of spatial coupling. In such cases, one can then use the so-called interpolation method to transfer results known for the spatially coupled case to the uncoupled one. Our main application of this framework is to LDPC codes, where we use interpolation to show that the average entropy of the codeword conditioned on the observation is asymptotically the same for spatially coupled as for uncoupled ensembles. We use this fact to prove the so-called Maxwell conjecture for a large class of ensembles. In a first paper last year, we have successfully implemented this strategy for the case of LDPC ensembles where the variable node degree distribution is Poisson. In the current paper we now show how to treat the practically more relevant case of general left degree distributions. In particular, regular ensembles fall within this framework. As we will see, a number of technical difficulties appear when compared to the simpler case of Poisson-distributed degrees. For our arguments to hold we need symmetry to be present. For coding, this symmetry follows from the channel symmetry; for general graphical models the required symmetry is called Nishimori symmetry. Andrei Giurgiu, Nicolas Macris, Rüdiger L. Urbanke |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2012 | How to prove the Maxwell conjecture via spatial coupling - A proof of conceptabstractInvestigations on spatially coupled codes have lead to the conjecture that, in the infinite size limit, the average input-output conditional entropy for spatially coupled low-density parity-check ensembles, over binary memoryless symmetric channels, equals the entropy of the underlying individual ensemble. We give a self-contained proof of this conjecture for the case when the variable degrees have a Poisson distribution and all check degrees are even. The ingredients of the proof are the interpolation method and the Nishimori identities. We explain why this result is an important step towards proving the Maxwell conjecture in the theory of low-density parity-check codes. Andrei Giurgiu, Nicolas Macris, Rüdiger L. Urbanke |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2010 | Computing in Social Networks
Andrei Giurgiu, Rachid Guerraoui, Kévin Huguenin, Anne-Marie Kermarrec |
SSS | 1 |
| 2010 | Fast Randomized Test-and-Set and Renaming
Dan Alistarh, Hagit Attiya, Seth Gilbert, Andrei Giurgiu, Rachid Guerraoui |
DISC | 4 |