Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Figen Ertas
dblp:35/9450
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security
speaker recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Recognition of Brand and Models of Cell-Phones From Recorded Speech Signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012 |
Audio and music processing › audio feature extraction
mel-frequency cepstral coefficients |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Recognition of Brand and Models of Cell-Phones From Recorded Speech Signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012 |
Audio and music processing
speech processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Recognition of Brand and Models of Cell-Phones From Recorded Speech Signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vector quantization · 0.3support vector machine · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Speaker identification from shouted speech: Analysis and compensationabstractText-independent speaker identification is studied using neutral and shouted speech in Finnish to analyze the effect of vocal mode mismatch between training and test utterances. Standard mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features with Gaussian mixture model (GMM) recognizer are used for speaker identification. The results indicate that speaker identification accuracy reduces from perfect (100 %) to 8.71 % under vocal mode mismatch. Because of this dramatic degradation in recognition accuracy, we propose to use a joint density GMM mapping technique for compensating the MFCC features. This mapping is trained on a disjoint emotional speech corpus to create a completely speaker- and speech mode independent emotion-neutralizing mapping. As a result of the compensation, the 8.71 % identification accuracy increases to 32.00 % without degrading the non-mismatched train-test conditions much. Cemal Hanilçi, Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Jouni Pohjalainen, Paavo Alku, Figen Ertas |
ICASSP | 6 |
| 2013 | Optimizing acoustic features for source cell-phone recognition using speech signalsabstractThis paper presents comparison and optimization of acoustic features for source cell-phone recognition using recorded speech signals. Different acoustic feature extraction methods such as Mel-frequency, linear frequency and Bark frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC, LFCC and BFCC) and linear prediction cepstral coefficients (LPCC) are considered. In addition to different feature sets, the effect of dynamic features, delta and double-delta coefficients (Δ and Δ2), and feature normalizations, cepstral mean normalization (CMN), cepstral variance normalization (CVN) and cepstral mean and variance normalization (CMVN) are also examined on the performance of source cell-phone recognition. The same support vector machine (SVM) classifier with fixed parameters and the same cell-phone dataset are used in the experiments in order to make a fair comparison of different features and feature normalization techniques. Cemal Hanilçi, Figen Ertas |
IH&MMSec | 2 |
| 2013 | Comparison of spectrum estimators in speaker verification: mismatch conditions induced by vocal effortabstractWe study the problem of vocal effort mismatch in speaker verification. Changes in speaker’s vocal effort induce changes in fundamental frequency (F0) and formant structure which introduce unwanted intra-speaker variations to features. We compare seven alternative spectrum estimators in the context of melfrequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) extraction for speaker verification. The compared variants include traditional FFT spectrum and six parametric all-pole models. Experimental results on the NIST 2010 speaker recognition evaluation (SRE) corpus utilizing both GMM-UBM and more recent GMM supervector classifier indicate that spectrum estimation has a considerable impact on speaker verification accuracy under mismatched vocal effort conditions. The highest recognition accuracy was achieved using a particular variant of temporally weighted all-pole model, stabilized weighted linear prediction (SWLP). Index Terms: speaker recognition, vocal effort mismatch, spectrum estimation Cemal Hanilçi, Tomi Kinnunen, Padmanabhan Rajan, Jouni Pohjalainen, Paavo Alku, Figen Ertas |
INTERSPEECH | 6 |
| 2012 | Comparing spectrum estimators in speaker verification under additive noise degradationabstractDifferent short-term spectrum estimators for speaker verification under additive noise are considered. Conventionally, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) are computed from discrete Fourier transform (DFT) spectra of windowed speech frames. Recently, linear prediction (LP) and its temporally weighted variants have been substituted as the spectrum analysis method in speech and speaker recognition. In this paper, 12 different short-term spectrum estimation methods are compared for speaker verification under additive noise contamination. Experimental results conducted on NIST 2002 SRE show that the spectrum estimation method has a large effect on recognition performance and stabilized weighted LP (SWLP) and minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) methods yield approximately 7 % and 8 % relative improvements over the standard DFT method at −10 dB SNR level of factory and babble noises, respectively in terms of equal error rate (EER). Cemal Hanilçi, Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Jouni Pohjalainen, Paavo Alku, Figen Ertas, Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten |
ICASSP | 6 |
| 2012 | A comparison of regression methods for remote tracking of Parkinson's disease progression
Ömer Eskidere, Figen Ertas, Cemal Hanilçi |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2012 | Regularized All-Pole Models for Speaker Verification Under Noisy EnvironmentsabstractRegularization of linear prediction based mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) extraction in speaker verification is considered. Commonly, MFCCs are extracted from the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) spectrum of speech frames. In this paper, DFT spectrum estimate is replaced with the recently proposed regularized linear prediction (RLP) method. Regularization of temporally weighted variants, weighted LP (WLP) and stabilized WLP (SWLP) which have earlier shown success in speech and speaker recognition, is also introduced. A novel type of double autocorrelation (DAC) lag windowing is also proposed to enhance robustness. Experiments on the NIST 2002 corpus indicate that regularized all-pole methods (RLP, RWLP and RSWLP) yield large improvement on recognition accuracy under additive factory and babble noise conditions in terms of both equal error rate (EER) and minimum detection cost function (MinDCF). Cemal Hanilçi, Tomi Kinnunen, Figen Ertas, Rahim Saeidi, Jouni Pohjalainen, Paavo Alku |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 3 |
| 2012 | Recognition of Brand and Models of Cell-Phones From Recorded Speech SignalsabstractSpeech signals convey various pieces of information such as the identity of its speaker, the language spoken, and the linguistic information about the text being spoken, etc. In this paper, we extract information about the cell phones from their speech records by using mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients and identify their brands and models. Closed-set identification rates of 92.56% and 96.42% have been obtained on a set of 14 different cell phones in the experiments using vector quantization and support vector machine classifiers, respectively. Cemal Hanilçi, Figen Ertas, Tuncay Ertas, Ömer Eskidere |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |