VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lea Zimmermann
dblp:350/3855
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
injective flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood estimation · 0.8bottleneck architecture · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Free-form Flows: Make Any Architecture a Normalizing FlowabstractNormalizing Flows are generative models that directly maximize the likelihood. Previously, the design of normalizing flows was largely constrained by the need for analytical invertibility. We overcome this constraint by a training procedure that uses an efficient estimator for the gradient of the change of variables formula. This enables any dimension-preserving neural network to serve as a generative model through maximum likelihood training. Our approach allows placing the emphasis on tailoring inductive biases precisely to the task at hand. Specifically, we achieve excellent results in molecule generation benchmarks utilizing E(n)-equivariant networks at greatly improved sampling speed. Moreover, our method is competitive in an inverse problem benchmark, while employing off-the-shelf ResNet architectures. We publish our code at https://github.com/vislearn/FFF. Felix Draxler, Peter Sorrenson, Lea Zimmermann, Armand Rousselot, Ullrich Köthe |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective FlowsabstractNormalizing Flows explicitly maximize a full-dimensional likelihood on the training data. However, real data is typically only supported on a lower-dimensional manifold leading the model to expend significant compute on modeling noise. Injective Flows fix this by jointly learning a manifold and the distribution on it. So far, they have been limited by restrictive architectures and/or high computational cost. We lift both constraints by a new efficient estimator for the maximum likelihood loss, compatible with free-form bottleneck architectures. We further show that naively learning both the data manifold and the distribution on it can lead to divergent solutions, and use this insight to motivate a stable maximum likelihood training objective. We perform extensive experiments on toy, tabular and image data, demonstrating the competitive performance of the resulting model. Peter Sorrenson, Felix Draxler, Armand Rousselot, Sander Hummerich, Lea Zimmermann, Ullrich Köthe |
ICLR | 5 |