Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mufan Bill Li

dblp:350/5111 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 76% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% Learning theory · 10%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hyperparameter transfer
1.622025
Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers · NeurIPS 2025
Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limit · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
1.522025
Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers · NeurIPS 2025
The Shaped Transformer: Attention Models in the Infinite Depth-and-Width Limit · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
compute-efficient training
0.912025
Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network
0.812024
Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limit · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
infinite-depth-and-width limit
0.712023
The Shaped Transformer: Attention Models in the Infinite Depth-and-Width Limit · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
The Shaped Transformer: Attention Models in the Infinite Depth-and-Width Limit · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › skip connections
residual connection
0.212023
The Shaped Transformer: Attention Models in the Infinite Depth-and-Width Limit · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximal update parameterization · 0.9lazy learning theory · 0.9mup parameterization · 0.8dynamical mean field theory · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.7mean-field theory · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers
abstract
We study compute efficiency of LLM training when using different parameterizations, i.e., rules for adjusting model and optimizer hyperparameters (HPs) as model size changes. Some parameterizations fail to transfer optimal base HPs (such as learning rate) across changes in model depth, requiring practitioners to either re-tune these HPs as they scale up (expensive), or accept sub-optimal training when re-tuning is prohibitive. Even when they achieve HP transfer, we develop theory to show parameterizations may still exist in the lazy learning regime where layers learn only features close to their linearization, preventing effective use of depth and nonlinearity. Finally, we identify and adopt the parameterization we call CompleteP that achieves both depth-wise HP transfer and non-lazy learning in all layers. CompleteP enables a wider range of model width/depth ratios to remain compute-efficient, unlocking shapes better suited for different hardware settings and operational contexts. Moreover, CompleteP enables 12-34% compute efficiency improvements over the prior state-of-the-art. All experiments were run on Cerebras CS-3 systems. A minimal implementation is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/nanoGPT-mup/tree/completep.
Nolan Dey, Bin Claire Zhang, Lorenzo Noci, Mufan Bill Li, Blake Bordelon, Shane Bergsma, Cengiz Pehlevan, Boris Hanin, Joel Hestness
NeurIPS4
2024 Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limit
abstract
The cost of hyperparameter tuning in deep learning has been rising with model sizes, prompting practitioners to find new tuning methods using a proxy of smaller networks. One such proposal uses $\mu$P parameterized networks, where the optimal hyperparameters for small width networks *transfer* to networks with arbitrarily large width. However, in this scheme, hyperparameters do not transfer across depths. As a remedy, we study residual networks with a residual branch scale of $1/\sqrt{\text{depth}}$ in combination with the $\mu$P parameterization. We provide experiments demonstrating that residual architectures including convolutional ResNets and vision transformers trained with this parameterization exhibit transfer of optimal hyperparameters across width and depth on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. Furthermore, our empirical findings are supported and motivated by theory. Using recent developments in the dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) description of neural network learning dynamics, we show that this parameterization of ResNets admits a well-defined feature learning joint infinite-width and infinite-depth limit and show convergence of finite-size network dynamics towards this limit.
Blake Bordelon, Lorenzo Noci, Mufan Bill Li, Boris Hanin, Cengiz Pehlevan
ICLR3
2023 The Shaped Transformer: Attention Models in the Infinite Depth-and-Width Limit
abstract
In deep learning theory, the covariance matrix of the representations serves as a proxy to examine the network’s trainability. Motivated by the success of Transform- ers, we study the covariance matrix of a modified Softmax-based attention model with skip connections in the proportional limit of infinite-depth-and-width. We show that at initialization the limiting distribution can be described by a stochastic differential equation (SDE) indexed by the depth-to-width ratio. To achieve a well-defined stochastic limit, the Transformer’s attention mechanism is modified by centering the Softmax output at identity, and scaling the Softmax logits by a width-dependent temperature parameter. We examine the stability of the network through the corresponding SDE, showing how the scale of both the drift and diffu- sion can be elegantly controlled with the aid of residual connections. The existence of a stable SDE implies that the covariance structure is well-behaved, even for very large depth and width, thus preventing the notorious issues of rank degeneracy in deep attention models. Finally, we show, through simulations, that the SDE provides a surprisingly good description of the corresponding finite-size model. We coin the name shaped Transformer for these architectural modifications.
Lorenzo Noci, Chuning Li, Mufan Bill Li, Bobby He, Thomas Hofmann 0001, Chris J. Maddison, Dan Roy
NeurIPS3