Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hailiang Dai

dblp:351/7603 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
1.012026
AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model safety
safety fine-tuning
1.012026
AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
fine-tuning safety
1.012026
AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
language model safety
1.012026
AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constrained optimization · 2.0alignment direction regularization · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin
abstract
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) improves performance but introduces critical safety vulnerabilities: even minimal harmful data can severely compromise safety measures. We observe that perturbations orthogonal to the alignment direction—defined by weight differences between aligned (safe) and unaligned models—rapidly compromise model safety. In contrast, updates along the alignment direction largely preserve it, revealing the parameter space as a "narrow safety basin". To address this, we propose AsFT (Anchoring Safety in Fine-Tuning) to maintain safety by explicitly constraining update directions during fine-tuning. By penalizing updates orthogonal to the alignment direction, AsFT effectively constrains the model within the "narrow safety basin," thus preserving its inherent safety. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets and models show that AsFT reduces harmful behaviors by up to 7.60%, improves task performance by 3.44%, and consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple tasks.
Qihui Zhang, Yue Huang 0001, Xiaojun Jia, Kun-Peng Ning, Jia-Yu Yao, Jigang Wang, Hailiang Dai, Yibing Song, Li Yuan 0007
AAAI9