Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alessia Gagliardi

dblp:352/2744 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph management
0.812024
Reactive Knowledge Management · ICDE 2024
Knowledge graphs
temporal knowledge graph
0.812024
Reactive Knowledge Management · ICDE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reactive rules · 0.8knowledge hubs · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Reactive Knowledge Management
abstract
Today's large knowledge graphs are conceived mainly for supporting search and e-commerce within large companies such as Google or Amazon, with well-crafted knowledge creation rules. Our recent experience of the COVID-19 pandemic, when knowledge has grown at unprecedented rates and has been often contradictory, inspired us to capture a huge gap in existing concepts and technology: today's knowledge management does not adequately support such a disruptive process. In this article, we propose the design and prototyping of the next generation of knowledge management concepts and systems, which will support domain diversity and scientific evolution as foundational ingredients. Change management is based on a reactive approach, well-established in database systems, but so far lacking in knowledge systems. We propose the reactive interaction of several knowledge hubs, each developed within a scientific domain and “owner” of a portion of a common knowledge representation. Knowledge is represented as graphs, with nodes and edges; edges may inter-connect nodes from different hubs. Most importantly, reactive rules cross the hub's borders and create the premises for a disciplined knowledge evolution, even under the pressure of crises. Similar challenges are not restricted to the recent pandemic and can address other crisis scenarios, including the catastrophic consequences of climate change or the recent (r)-evolution in artificial intelligence, studied by several scientific communities, whose management requires complex and controversial choices.
Stefano Ceri, Anna Bernasconi 0002, Alessia Gagliardi
ICDE3