Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ellie Y. Cheng
dblp:352/3668
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-6128-0351ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Programming languages and type systems · 73% Program analysis · 27% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Inference Plans for Hybrid Particle Filtering · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › probabilistic programming
probabilistic programming language |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Inference Plans for Hybrid Particle Filtering · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Program analysis › static analysis
abstract interpretation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Inference Plans for Hybrid Particle Filtering · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › specification language
annotation language |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Inference Plans for Hybrid Particle Filtering · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
particle filtering · 1.7monte carlo methods · 1.7interpreter · 1.7instruction fine-tuning · 1.7abstract interpretation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous DecodingabstractDecoding with autoregressive language models traditionally occurs sequentially, generating one token after another. Recent attempts to introduce parallelism require a pre-determined structure in the generated content to implement parallel generation, such as by pattern-matching on bullet points. In this work, we present a new technique to automate parallel generation by dynamically exploiting the semantic independence of generation outputs to implement asynchronous decoding. We introduce an annotation language Pasta-Lang for language models to initiate asynchronous decoding at inference time. We also develop an accompanying Pasta-Lang interpreter that performs on-the-fly asynchronous decoding, effectively implementing parallel generation and speeding up inference. We present an instruction-finetuning dataset with Pasta-Lang-annotated responses for teaching LLMs to annotate semantic independence with Pasta-Lang as well as the methodology for creating the dataset. Our evaluation shows using the interpreter with a Pasta-Lang-equipped model achieves significant speedup while maintaining the same generation quality. Ellie Y. Cheng, Zachary Ankner, Nikunj Saunshi, Blake M. Elias, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley, Suvinay Subramanian, Michael Carbin |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Inference Plans for Hybrid Particle FilteringabstractAdvanced probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) using hybrid particle filtering combine symbolic exact inference and Monte Carlo methods to improve inference performance. These systems use heuristics to partition random variables within the program into variables that are encoded symbolically and variables that are encoded with sampled values, and the heuristics are not necessarily aligned with the developer’s performance evaluation metrics. In this work, we present inference plans , a programming interface that enables developers to control the partitioning of random variables during hybrid particle filtering. We further present Siren , a new PPL that enables developers to use annotations to specify inference plans the inference system must implement. To assist developers with statically reasoning about whether an inference plan can be implemented, we present an abstract-interpretation-based static analysis for Siren for determining inference plan satisfiability . We prove the analysis is sound with respect to Siren ’s semantics. Our evaluation applies inference plans to three different hybrid particle filtering algorithms on a suite of benchmarks. It shows that the control provided by inference plans enables speed ups of 1.76 x on average and up to 206 x to reach a target accuracy, compared to the inference plans implemented by default heuristics; the results also show that inference plans improve accuracy by 1.83 x on average and up to 595 x with less or equal runtime, compared to the default inference plans. We further show that our static analysis is precise in practice, identifying all satisfiable inference plans in 27 out of the 33 benchmark-algorithm evaluation settings. Ellie Y. Cheng, Eric Atkinson, Guillaume Baudart, Louis Mandel, Michael Carbin |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |