Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu-Ran Gu
dblp:352/4158
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1539-9988ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 87% Approximation and online algorithms · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
constrained submodular maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Submodular Maximization under the Intersection of Matroid and Knapsack Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Submodular Maximization under the Intersection of Matroid and Knapsack Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Submodular Maximization under the Intersection of Matroid and Knapsack Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random enumeration · 0.7partial enumeration · 0.7greedy algorithm · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Subset Selection for Evolutionary Multiobjective OptimizationabstractSubset selection, which selects a subset of solutions according to certain criterion/indicator, is a topic closely related to evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO). The critical component of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), environmental selection, is essentially a subset selection problem, i.e., selecting$N$solutions as the next-generation population from usually$2N$candidates (where$N$denotes the size of the population). Another use of subset selection is the solution preprocessing procedure for decision-making, in which typically a few representatives are selected from the final population or a large-size archive, in order not to overwhelm the decision maker. Existing work for subset selection in EMO is focused on developing greedy algorithms, but may suffer from being trapped in local optima. In this article, we approach the problem by providing a multiobjective evolutionary algorithmic framework. We consider several popular quality indicators for subset evaluation and present accelerated variants of a well-studied MOEA in the theoretical study area, global simple evolutionary multiobjective optimizer (GSEMO), for each indicator. We conduct rigorous theoretical analyses of the acceleration procedure. Moreover, we prove that our algorithms can achieve the best-so-far approximation guarantee by the submodularity of the indicators. We finally empirically show the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed algorithms, in addition to the potentials to be further improved by introducing popular MOEAs (e.g., using NSGA-II and MOEA/D to replace GSEMO). Yu-Ran Gu, Chao Bian 0002, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. | 1 |
| 2023 | Submodular Maximization under the Intersection of Matroid and Knapsack ConstraintsabstractSubmodular maximization arises in many applications, and has attracted a lot of research attentions from various areas such as artificial intelligence, finance and operations research. Previous studies mainly consider only one kind of constraint, while many real-world problems often involve several constraints. In this paper, we consider the problem of submodular maximization under the intersection of two commonly used constraints, i.e., k-matroid constraint and m-knapsack constraint, and propose a new algorithm SPROUT by incorporating partial enumeration into the simultaneous greedy framework. We prove that SPROUT can achieve a polynomial-time approximation guarantee better than the state-of-the-art algorithms. Then, we introduce the random enumeration and smooth techniques into SPROUT to improve its efficiency, resulting in the SPROUT++ algorithm, which can keep a similar approximation guarantee. Experiments on the applications of movie recommendation and weighted max-cut demonstrate the superiority of SPROUT++ in practice. Yu-Ran Gu, Chao Bian 0002, Chao Qian 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |