Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chloé Messdaghi

dblp:352/7115 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 87% Usable security · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
human factors in vulnerability discovery
0.712023
Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.712023
Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.712023
Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery
abstract
Vulnerability discovery is an essential aspect of software security. Currently, the demand for security experts significantly exceeds the available vulnerability discovery workforce. Further, the existing vulnerability discovery workforce is highly homogeneous, dominated by white and Asian men. As such, one promising avenue for increasing the capacity of the vulnerability discovery community is through recruitment and retention from a broader population. Although significant prior research has explored the challenges of equity and inclusion in computing broadly, the competitive and frequently self-taught nature of vulnerability discovery work may create new variations on these challenges. This paper reports on a semi-structured interview study (N = 16) investigating how people from marginalized populations come to participate in vulnerability discovery, whether they feel welcomed by the vulnerability discovery community, and what challenges they face when joining the vulnerability discovery community. We find that members of marginalized populations face some unique challenges, while other challenges common in vulnerability discovery are exacerbated by marginalization.
Kelsey R. Fulton, Samantha Katcher, Kevin Song, Marshini Chetty, Michelle L. Mazurek, Chloé Messdaghi, Daniel Votipka
SP6