VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zibin Pan
dblp:352/9594
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9482-446XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 86% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict Mitigation · AAAI 2025 FedLF: Layer-Wise Fair Federated Learning · AAAI 2024 FedMDFG: Federated Learning with Multi-Gradient Descent and Fair Guidance · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › trustworthy federated learning
fair federated learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | FedLF: Layer-Wise Fair Federated Learning · AAAI 2024 FedMDFG: Federated Learning with Multi-Gradient Descent and Fair Guidance · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict Mitigation · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › machine unlearning
federated unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict Mitigation · AAAI 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy regulation
right to be forgotten |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict Mitigation · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FedLF: Layer-Wise Fair Federated Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FedLF: Layer-Wise Fair Federated Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-objective optimization · 2.2orthogonal steepest descent · 1.7gradient conflict mitigation · 1.7gradient ascent · 1.7layer-wise gradient conflict resolution · 1.5multi-gradient descent · 0.7line search · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict MitigationabstractFederated Learning (FL) has received much attention in recent years. However, although clients are not required to share their data in FL, the global model itself can implicitly remember clients' local data. Therefore, it’s necessary to effectively remove the target client's data from the FL global model to ease the risk of privacy leakage and implement "the right to be forgotten". Federated Unlearning (FU) has been considered a promising solution to remove data without full retraining. But the model utility easily suffers significant reduction during unlearning due to the gradient conflicts. Furthermore, when conducting the post-training to recovery the model utility, it’s prone to move back and revert what have already been unlearned. To address these issues, we propose Federated Unlearning with Orthogonal Steepest Descent (FedOSD). We first design an unlearning cross entropy loss to overcome the convergence issue of the gradient ascent. A steepest descent direction for unlearning is then calculated in the condition of being non-conflicting with other clients’ gradients and closest to the target client's gradient. This benefits to efficiently unlearn and mitigate the model utility reduction. After unlearning, we recover the model utility by maintaining the achievement of unlearning. Finally, extensive experiments in several FL scenarios verify that FedOSD outperforms the SOTA FU algorithms in terms of unlearning and the model utility. Zibin Pan, Kaiyan Zheng, Boqi Wang, Xiaoying Tang 0002, Junhua Zhao 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-Objective Large Language Model UnlearningabstractMachine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs) has attracted great attention recently, which aims to effectively eliminate undesirable behaviors from LLMs without full retraining from scratch. In this paper, we explore the Gradient Ascent (GA) approach in LLM unlearning, which is a proactive way to decrease the prediction probability of the model on the target data in order to remove their influence. We analyze two challenges that render the process impractical: gradient explosion and catastrophic forgetting. To address these issues, we propose Multi-Objective Large Language Model Unlearning (MOLLM) algorithm. We first formulate LLM unlearning as a multi-objective optimization problem, in which the cross-entropy loss is modified to the unlearning version to overcome the gradient explosion issue. A common descent update direction is then calculated, which enables the model to forget the target data while preserving the utility of the LLM. Our empirical results verify that MoLLM outperforms the SOTA GA-based LLM unlearning methods in terms of unlearning effect and model utility preservation. The source code is available at https://github.com/zibinpan/MOLLM. Zibin Pan, Yuesheng Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Junhua Zhao 0001 |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2025 | Balancing the trade-off between global and personalized performance in federated learning
Zibin Pan, Fangchen Yu, Xiaoying Tang 0002, Junhua Zhao 0001 |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2024 | FedLF: Layer-Wise Fair Federated LearningabstractFairness has become an important concern in Federated Learning (FL). An unfair model that performs well for some clients while performing poorly for others can reduce the willingness of clients to participate. In this work, we identify a direct cause of unfairness in FL - the use of an unfair direction to update the global model, which favors some clients while conflicting with other clients’ gradients at the model and layer levels. To address these issues, we propose a layer-wise fair Federated Learning algorithm (FedLF). Firstly, we formulate a multi-objective optimization problem with an effective fair-driven objective for FL. A layer-wise fair direction is then calculated to mitigate the model and layer-level gradient conflicts and reduce the improvement bias. We further provide the theoretical analysis on how FedLF can improve fairness and guarantee convergence. Extensive experiments on different learning tasks and models demonstrate that FedLF outperforms the SOTA FL algorithms in terms of accuracy and fairness. The source code is available at https://github.com/zibinpan/FedLF. Zibin Pan, Fangchen Yu, Xiaoying Tang 0002, Junhua Zhao 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | FedMDFG: Federated Learning with Multi-Gradient Descent and Fair GuidanceabstractFairness has been considered as a critical problem in federated learning (FL). In this work, we analyze two direct causes of unfairness in FL - an unfair direction and an improper step size when updating the model. To solve these issues, we introduce an effective way to measure fairness of the model through the cosine similarity, and then propose a federated multiple gradient descent algorithm with fair guidance (FedMDFG) to drive the model fairer. We first convert FL into a multi-objective optimization problem (MOP) and design an advanced multiple gradient descent algorithm to calculate a fair descent direction by adding a fair-driven objective to MOP. A low-communication-cost line search strategy is then designed to find a better step size for the model update. We further show the theoretical analysis on how it can enhance fairness and guarantee the convergence. Finally, extensive experiments in several FL scenarios verify that FedMDFG is robust and outperforms the SOTA FL algorithms in convergence and fairness. The source code is available at https://github.com/zibinpan/FedMDFG. Zibin Pan, Xiaoying Tang 0002, Junhua Zhao 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |