Educational technology (EdTech) solutions have shown promise for disseminating educational opportunities to last-mile learners, particularly in the Global South. Low-infrastructure EdTech as a digital learning resource is especially critical to understand in remote contexts where educational opportunities and resources are limited. Our work investigated insights from 81 learners who engaged with a remote course that provided engineering education through radios and mobile phones in rural Uganda. Findings revealed that the course facilitated goal-driven and practical motivations in safe, adaptable environments. Our work goes beyond the idea that low-infrastructure EdTech can easily facilitate learning, highlighting diverse learner experiences navigating radio and phone use and presenting novel findings on community skepticism towards the course. Our research extends the EdTech and HCI literature by bringing light to the underrepresented voices of last-mile learners, sharing their insights on interacting with low-infrastructure EdTech, and how these insights can guide the design of contextually aligned EdTech.

Most learners worldwide are multilingual, yet implementing multilingual education remains challenging in practice. EdTech offers an opportunity to bridge this gap and expand access for linguistically diverse learners. We conducted a quasi-experiment in Uganda with 2,931 participants enrolled in a non-formal radio- and mobile-based engineering course, where learners self-selected instruction in Leb Lango (a local language), English, or a Hybrid option combining both languages. The Leb Lango version of the course was used disproportionately by learners from rural areas, those with less formal education, and those with lower prior knowledge, broadening participation among disadvantaged learners. Moreover, the availability of Leb Lango instruction was associated with higher active participation, even among learners who registered for English instruction. Although Leb Lango learners began with lower performance, they demonstrated faster learning gains and achieved comparable final examination outcomes to English and Hybrid learners. These results suggest that providing local language options to learners is an effective way to make EdTech more accessible.

This quasi-experimental study integrates a large language model (LLM) with expert qualitative analysis to examine how instructional design variations in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) shape collaboration in data-centric programming. We collected 73 team transcripts from two contrasting CSCL designs deployed across five course offerings: a closed-ended variant with prescribed solution paths and auto-graded milestones, and an open-ended variant supporting exploratory tasks with multiple valid paths. LLM annotation revealed statistically significant differences in knowledge co-construction patterns: the open-ended design yielded a higher proportion of utterances focused on developing a shared understanding of problems and solutions. Guided by these quantitative results, human experts conducted qualitative coding that confirmed and enriched these findings, showing how open-ended tasks fostered elaborative solution negotiation while closed-ended structures promoted non-elaborative exchanges. Our contributions are: (1) instructional insights for data science education, demonstrating how open-ended CSCL designs better support collaborative sense-making essential for real-world data science projects; and (2) a documented workflow for human-LLM co-evaluation, providing the methodological detail necessary for others to replicate our process and apply it to future studies.

Expanding access to education in rural African communities remains difficult, largely due to limited internet connectivity. Mobile learning courses delivered via radio and offline mobile phones offer a promising, scalable solution. However, it is challenging to track student engagement in these environments due to the absence of tools that monitor students' interactions with the radio. In this study, we investigate the potential of ''Prize Codes'' -- codes read aloud during broadcasts that students enter via text message -- to serve as a real-time measure of student engagement with mobile-learning broadcasts. Using data from a 2024 implementation of Yiya AirScience, a mobile engineering course in Uganda, we evaluate the validity of Prize Codes as an engagement metric. Specifically, we test whether Prize Code measures (1) demonstrate reliability, with students who enter correct codes in one lesson being more likely to do so in subsequent lessons; (2) demonstrate convergent validity with existing measures of engagement; and (3) demonstrate predictive validity, predicting learning outcomes in the course. Our findings suggest that Prize Codes are a reliable and valid measure of engagement. Prize-Code accuracy demonstrates strong internal consistency (alpha = .97) and moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = .44). The measure aligns closely with synchronous participation (87% agreement, Cohen's kappa = .50), indicating it captures similar engagement patterns. Importantly, students who consistently enter correct Prize Codes perform significantly better on assessments, with Prize Code engagement predicting final exam scores above and beyond other engagement metrics. After establishing the measure's validity, we use it to (1) characterize patterns of engagement with Yiya broadcasts, (2) investigate early engagement with the broadcasts as a predictor of course persistence, and (3) replicate findings about the benefits of learning by doing. This study suggests that Prize Codes can be a feasible, scalable approach for tracking real-time engagement in resource-limited mobile learning settings at scale.

Despite the best intentions to support equity with educational technologies, they often lead to a “rich get richer” effect, in which communities of more advantaged learners gain greater benefit from these solutions. Effective design of these technologies necessitates a deeper understanding of learners in understudied contexts and their motivations to pursue an education. Consequently, we studied a 15-week remote course launched in 2021 with 17,896 learners that provided engineering education through a radio and phone-based system aimed for use in rural settings within Northern Uganda. We address shifts in learners’ motivations for course participation and investigate the impact of demographic features and motivations of students on persistence and performance. We found significant increases in student motivation to learn more about and pursue STEM. Importantly, the course was most successful for learners in demographics who typically experience fewer educational opportunities, showing promise for such technologies to close opportunity gaps.