VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matti Vahs
dblp:353/6068
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6046-7460ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 92% Robot navigation and mapping · 8% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Forward Invariance in Trajectory Spaces for Safety-Critical Control · ICRA 2025 Risk-aware Control for Robots with Non-Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
safe control |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Forward Invariance in Trajectory Spaces for Safety-Critical Control · ICRA 2025 Risk-aware Control for Robots with Non-Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › motion planning under uncertainty
belief space planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Risk-aware Spatio-temporal Logic Planning in Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Risk-aware Spatio-temporal Logic Planning in Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | Risk-aware Control for Robots with Non-Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2024 Risk-aware Spatio-temporal Logic Planning in Gaussian Belief Spaces · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
receding horizon control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Forward Invariance in Trajectory Spaces for Safety-Critical Control · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
control barrier functions · 1.6receding horizon control · 0.9quadratic programming · 0.9particle filter · 0.8trajectory synthesis · 0.7risk signal temporal logic · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Forward Invariance in Trajectory Spaces for Safety-Critical ControlabstractUseful robot control algorithms should not only achieve performance objectives but also adhere to hard safety constraints. Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) have been developed to provably ensure system safety through forward invariance. However, they often unnecessarily sacrifice performance for safety since they are purely reactive. Receding horizon control (RHC), on the other hand, consider planned trajectories to account for the future evolution of a system. This work provides a new perspective on safety-critical control by introducing Forward Invariance in Trajectory Spaces (FITS). We lift the problem of safe RHC into the trajectory space and describe the evolution of planned trajectories as a controlled dynamical system. Safety constraints defined over states can be converted into sets in the trajectory space which we render forward invariant via a CBF framework. We derive an efficient quadratic program (QP) to synthesize trajectories that provably satisfy safety constraints. Our experiments support that FITS improves the adherence to safety specifications without sacrificing performance over alternative CBF and NMPC methods. Matti Vahs, Rafael I. Cabral Muchacho, Florian T. Pokorny, Jana Tumova |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | Risk-aware Control for Robots with Non-Gaussian Belief SpacesabstractThis paper addresses the problem of safety-critical control of autonomous robots, considering the ubiquitous uncertainties arising from un-modeled dynamics and noisy sensors. To take into account these uncertainties, probabilistic state estimators are often deployed to obtain a belief over possible states. Namely, Particle Filters (PFs) can handle arbitrary non-Gaussian distributions in the robot’s state. In this work, we define the belief state and belief dynamics for continuous-discrete PFs and construct safe sets in the underlying belief space. We design a controller that provably keeps the robot’s belief state within this safe set. As a result, we ensure that the risk of the unknown robot’s state violating a safety specification, such as avoiding a dangerous area, is bounded. We provide an open-source implementation as a ROS2 package and evaluate the solution in simulations and hardware experiments involving high-dimensional belief spaces. Matti Vahs, Jana Tumova |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2023 | Risk-aware Spatio-temporal Logic Planning in Gaussian Belief SpacesabstractIn many real-world robotic scenarios, we cannot assume exact knowledge about a robot's state due to unmodeled dynamics or noisy sensors. Planning in belief space addresses this problem by tightly coupling perception and planning modules to obtain trajectories that take into account the environment's stochasticity. However, existing works are often limited to tasks such as the classic reach-avoid problem and do not provide risk awareness. We propose a risk-aware planning strategy in belief space that minimizes the risk of violating a given specification and enables a robot to actively gather information about its state. We use Risk Signal Temporal Logic (RiSTL) as a specification language in belief space to express complex spatio-temporal missions including predicates over Gaussian beliefs. We synthesize trajectories for challenging scenarios that cannot be expressed through classical reach-avoid properties and show that risk-aware objectives improve the uncertainty reduction in a robot's belief. Matti Vahs, Christian Pek, Jana Tumova |
ICRA | 1 |