Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wubiao Xu

dblp:353/6773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
data dependence analysis
0.812024
AutoCheck: Automatically Identifying Variables for Checkpointing by Data Dependency Analysis · SC 2024
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.812024
AutoCheck: Automatically Identifying Variables for Checkpointing by Data Dependency Analysis · SC 2024
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.812024
AutoCheck: Automatically Identifying Variables for Checkpointing by Data Dependency Analysis · SC 2024
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension
0.212024
AutoCheck: Automatically Identifying Variables for Checkpointing by Data Dependency Analysis · SC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic variable identification · 1.5data dependency graph · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 AutoCheck: Automatically Identifying Variables for Checkpointing by Data Dependency Analysis
abstract
Checkpoint/Restart (C/R) has been widely deployed in numerous HPC systems, Clouds, and industrial data centers, which are typically operated by system engineers. Nevertheless, there is no existing approach that helps system engineers without domain expertise, and domain scientists without system fault tolerance knowledge identify those critical variables accounted for correct application execution restoration in a failure for C/R. To address this problem, we propose an analytical model and a tool (AutoCheck) that can automatically identify critical variables to checkpoint for C/R. AutoCheck relies on first, analytically tracking and optimizing data dependency between variables and other application execution state, and second, a set of heuristics that identify critical variables for checkpointing from the refined data dependency graph (DDG). AutoCheck allows programmers to pinpoint critical variables to checkpoint quickly within a few minutes. We evaluate AutoCheck on 14 representative HPC benchmarks, demonstrating that AutoCheck can efficiently identify correct critical variables to checkpoint.
Shiman Meng, Wubiao Xu, Luanzheng Guo, Kento Sato
SC5