Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiafeng Liang
dblp:354/0010
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5747-6187ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Video understanding and tracking · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
large language model trustworthiness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty Calibration · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
structured reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty Calibration · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal consistency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › activity recognition › procedural activity understanding › procedural video understanding
instructional video understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension · IJCAI 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › dynamic scene analysis › video scene understanding
video scene graph generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension · IJCAI 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene graph generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topology-aware reasoning · 1.0symbolic reasoning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0cognitive confidence modeling · 1.0alignment framework · 1.0temporal consistency enhancement · 0.9robustness evaluation · 0.9temporal dependency model · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty CalibrationabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet they generally lack self-awareness, often displaying overconfidence when confronted with questions beyond their knowledge boundaries. This limitation severely hinders their trustworthiness in high-stakes scenarios. Existing calibration methods typically rely on sampling accuracy, derived from multiple outputs, as a proxy for model confidence. However, this coarse-grained metric fails to capture the model’s internal cognitive states, such as confusion, hallucination, or persistent belief in false knowledge. To address this, we propose CogConf (Cognitive Confidence), a cognitively grounded uncertainty signal that extends sampling accuracy by incorporating the semantic diversity of incorrect answers and the model’s abstention behaviors. By shifting the focus from sampling-based to cognition-oriented uncertainty modeling, CogConf offers a more faithful reflection of the model's internal beliefs. Building on this signal, we introduce CogAlign, a simple yet effective alignment framework that explicitly aligns the model’s verbalized confidence with CogConf, thereby producing uncertainty estimates that better reflect the model’s internal cognition. Experimental results on six knowledge-intensive in-domain and out-of-domain QA datasets demonstrate that CogConf robustly characterizes the model's internal uncertainty. Building on this foundation, CogAlign guides the model's expression to significantly enhance the trustworthiness and utility of its uncertainty calibration without compromising its underlying QA capabilities, while also demonstrating strong cross-task generalization and output stability. Offering a new pathway toward building more trustworthy LLMs. Tao He 0014, Jiafeng Liang, Ming Liu 0004 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language ModelsabstractRunxuan Liu, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Jiyuan Wang, Jiafeng Liang, Jiaqi Li, Tao He, Zheng Chu, Rongchuan Mu, Zekun Wang, Baoxin Wang, Dayong Wu, Ming Liu, Shijin Wang, Guoping Hu, Bing Qin. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Runxuan Liu, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Jiafeng Liang, Jiaqi Li 0004, Tao He 0014, Rongchuan Mu, Zekun Wang 0001, Baoxin Wang, Dayong Wu, Ming Liu 0004, Shijin Wang 0001, Bing Qin 0001 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2026 | APSam: An Aggregating-Then-Pruning Sampler for Question-Conditional DenoisingabstractVideo question answering (VideoQA) necessitates simultaneous understanding of visual and linguistic information, requiring both in-depth analysis of individual modality features and the establishment of cross-modal correlations to achieve precise reasoning. However, VideoQA models often struggle with irrelevant temporal and spatial noise due to the dense events and concepts in real-world complex video contents. Previous works reduce noise by only sampling a fixed number of visual tokens at the patch level, overlooking the variation in the required granularities of features and quantities of visual cues across different question conditions. To address these, we propose an Aggregating-then-Pruning Sampler (APSam), which diversifies feature granularities and adaptively denoises on a per-question basis. Specifically, we propose a conditional token aggregator to obtain multi-granularity visual semantics by merging similar question-relevant tokens. Then, we propose a conditional token pruner, which restricts noise tokens through a variable-capacity receptive field determined by the inputs. Experimental results show that APSam achieves significant performance on three challenging complex VideoQA datasets,i.e., AGQAv2, NExT-QA, and STAR. Further analyses reveal that the APSam also exhibits high reasoning capability and interpretability. Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Wei Tang 0015, Ning Wang 0020, Zekun Wang 0001, Xun Mao, Ming Liu 0004, Bing Qin 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. | 1 |
| 2025 | Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal InconsistencyabstractJiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Xuan Dong, Ning Wang, Zheng Chu, Hui Su, Jinlan Fu, Ming Liu, See-Kiong Ng, Bing Qin. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Ning Wang 0020, Hui Su, Jinlan Fu, Ming Liu 0004, See-Kiong Ng, Bing Qin 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | SmartTrim: Adaptive Tokens and Attention Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language ModelsabstractDespite achieving remarkable performance on various vision-language tasks, Transformer-based Vision-Language Models (VLMs) suffer from redundancy in inputs and parameters, significantly hampering their efficiency in real-world applications. Moreover, the degree of redundancy in token representations and model parameters, such as attention heads, varies significantly for different inputs. In light of the challenges, we propose SmartTrim, an adaptive acceleration framework for VLMs, which adjusts the computational overhead per instance. Specifically, we integrate lightweight modules into the original backbone to identify and prune redundant token representations and attention heads within each layer. Furthermore, we devise a self-distillation strategy to enhance the consistency between the predictions of the pruned model and its fully-capacity counterpart. Experimental results across various vision-language tasks consistently demonstrate that SmartTrim accelerates the original model by 2-3 times with minimal performance degradation, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency compared to previous approaches. Code will be available at https://github.com/kugwzk/SmartTrim. Zekun Wang 0001, Jingchang Chen, Wangchunshu Zhou, Jiafeng Liang, Liping Shan, Ming Liu 0004, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang 0033, Bing Qin 0001 |
LREC/COLING | 5 |
| 2024 | GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension
Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Zekun Wang 0001, Haojie Pan, Zerui Chen, Ming Liu 0004, Ruiji Fu, Zhongyuan Wang 0006, Bing Qin 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2023 | GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph GenerationabstractDynamic scene graph generation aims to identify visual relationships (subject-predicate-object) in frames based on spatio-temporal contextual information in the video. Previous work implicitly models the spatio-temporal interaction simultaneously, which leads to entanglement of spatio-temporal contextual information. To this end, we propose a Grafting-Then-Reassembling framework (GTR), which explicitly extracts intra-frame spatial information and inter-frame temporal information in two separate stages to decouple spatio-temporal contextual information. Specifically, we first graft a static scene graph generation model to generate static visual relationships within frames. Then we propose the temporal dependency model to extract the temporal dependencies across frames, and explicitly reassemble static visual relationships into dynamic scene graphs. Experimental results show that GTR achieves the state-of-the-art performance on Action Genome dataset. Further analyses reveal that the reassembling stage is crucial to the success of our framework. Jiafeng Liang, Yuxin Wang 0002, Zekun Wang 0001, Ming Liu 0004, Ruiji Fu, Zhongyuan Wang 0006, Bing Qin 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |