Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiafeng Liang

dblp:354/0010 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5747-6187ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Video understanding and tracking · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph reasoning
1.012026
Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
large language model trustworthiness
1.012026
From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty Calibration · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for reasoning
1.012026
Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
structured reasoning
1.012026
Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration
1.012026
From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty Calibration · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal consistency
0.912025
Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › activity recognition › procedural activity understanding › procedural video understanding
instructional video understanding
0.812024
GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension · IJCAI 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › dynamic scene analysis › video scene understanding
video scene graph generation
0.712023
GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
0.312026
Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding
0.312025
Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model
0.212024
GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension · IJCAI 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene graph generation
0.212023
GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning
0.212023
GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation · IJCAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topology-aware reasoning · 1.0symbolic reasoning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0cognitive confidence modeling · 1.0alignment framework · 1.0temporal consistency enhancement · 0.9robustness evaluation · 0.9temporal dependency model · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Sampling to Cognition: Modeling Internal Cognitive Confidence in Language Models for Robust Uncertainty Calibration
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet they generally lack self-awareness, often displaying overconfidence when confronted with questions beyond their knowledge boundaries. This limitation severely hinders their trustworthiness in high-stakes scenarios. Existing calibration methods typically rely on sampling accuracy, derived from multiple outputs, as a proxy for model confidence. However, this coarse-grained metric fails to capture the model’s internal cognitive states, such as confusion, hallucination, or persistent belief in false knowledge. To address this, we propose CogConf (Cognitive Confidence), a cognitively grounded uncertainty signal that extends sampling accuracy by incorporating the semantic diversity of incorrect answers and the model’s abstention behaviors. By shifting the focus from sampling-based to cognition-oriented uncertainty modeling, CogConf offers a more faithful reflection of the model's internal beliefs. Building on this signal, we introduce CogAlign, a simple yet effective alignment framework that explicitly aligns the model’s verbalized confidence with CogConf, thereby producing uncertainty estimates that better reflect the model’s internal cognition. Experimental results on six knowledge-intensive in-domain and out-of-domain QA datasets demonstrate that CogConf robustly characterizes the model's internal uncertainty. Building on this foundation, CogAlign guides the model's expression to significantly enhance the trustworthiness and utility of its uncertainty calibration without compromising its underlying QA capabilities, while also demonstrating strong cross-task generalization and output stability. Offering a new pathway toward building more trustworthy LLMs.
Tao He 0014, Jiafeng Liang, Ming Liu 0004
AAAI3
2026 Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models
abstract
Runxuan Liu, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Jiyuan Wang, Jiafeng Liang, Jiaqi Li, Tao He, Zheng Chu, Rongchuan Mu, Zekun Wang, Baoxin Wang, Dayong Wu, Ming Liu, Shijin Wang, Guoping Hu, Bing Qin. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Runxuan Liu, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Jiafeng Liang, Jiaqi Li 0004, Tao He 0014, Rongchuan Mu, Zekun Wang 0001, Baoxin Wang, Dayong Wu, Ming Liu 0004, Shijin Wang 0001, Bing Qin 0001
ACL (1)5
2026 APSam: An Aggregating-Then-Pruning Sampler for Question-Conditional Denoising
abstract
Video question answering (VideoQA) necessitates simultaneous understanding of visual and linguistic information, requiring both in-depth analysis of individual modality features and the establishment of cross-modal correlations to achieve precise reasoning. However, VideoQA models often struggle with irrelevant temporal and spatial noise due to the dense events and concepts in real-world complex video contents. Previous works reduce noise by only sampling a fixed number of visual tokens at the patch level, overlooking the variation in the required granularities of features and quantities of visual cues across different question conditions. To address these, we propose an Aggregating-then-Pruning Sampler (APSam), which diversifies feature granularities and adaptively denoises on a per-question basis. Specifically, we propose a conditional token aggregator to obtain multi-granularity visual semantics by merging similar question-relevant tokens. Then, we propose a conditional token pruner, which restricts noise tokens through a variable-capacity receptive field determined by the inputs. Experimental results show that APSam achieves significant performance on three challenging complex VideoQA datasets,i.e., AGQAv2, NExT-QA, and STAR. Further analyses reveal that the APSam also exhibits high reasoning capability and interpretability.
Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Wei Tang 0015, Ning Wang 0020, Zekun Wang 0001, Xun Mao, Ming Liu 0004, Bing Qin 0001
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol.1
2025 Investigating and Enhancing the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Temporal Inconsistency
abstract
Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Xuan Dong, Ning Wang, Zheng Chu, Hui Su, Jinlan Fu, Ming Liu, See-Kiong Ng, Bing Qin. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Ning Wang 0020, Hui Su, Jinlan Fu, Ming Liu 0004, See-Kiong Ng, Bing Qin 0001
ACL (1)1
2024 SmartTrim: Adaptive Tokens and Attention Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language Models
abstract
Despite achieving remarkable performance on various vision-language tasks, Transformer-based Vision-Language Models (VLMs) suffer from redundancy in inputs and parameters, significantly hampering their efficiency in real-world applications. Moreover, the degree of redundancy in token representations and model parameters, such as attention heads, varies significantly for different inputs. In light of the challenges, we propose SmartTrim, an adaptive acceleration framework for VLMs, which adjusts the computational overhead per instance. Specifically, we integrate lightweight modules into the original backbone to identify and prune redundant token representations and attention heads within each layer. Furthermore, we devise a self-distillation strategy to enhance the consistency between the predictions of the pruned model and its fully-capacity counterpart. Experimental results across various vision-language tasks consistently demonstrate that SmartTrim accelerates the original model by 2-3 times with minimal performance degradation, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency compared to previous approaches. Code will be available at https://github.com/kugwzk/SmartTrim.
Zekun Wang 0001, Jingchang Chen, Wangchunshu Zhou, Jiafeng Liang, Liping Shan, Ming Liu 0004, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang 0033, Bing Qin 0001
LREC/COLING5
2024 GUIDE: A Guideline-Guided Dataset for Instructional Video Comprehension
Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Zekun Wang 0001, Haojie Pan, Zerui Chen, Ming Liu 0004, Ruiji Fu, Zhongyuan Wang 0006, Bing Qin 0001
IJCAI1
2023 GTR: A Grafting-Then-Reassembling Framework for Dynamic Scene Graph Generation
abstract
Dynamic scene graph generation aims to identify visual relationships (subject-predicate-object) in frames based on spatio-temporal contextual information in the video. Previous work implicitly models the spatio-temporal interaction simultaneously, which leads to entanglement of spatio-temporal contextual information. To this end, we propose a Grafting-Then-Reassembling framework (GTR), which explicitly extracts intra-frame spatial information and inter-frame temporal information in two separate stages to decouple spatio-temporal contextual information. Specifically, we first graft a static scene graph generation model to generate static visual relationships within frames. Then we propose the temporal dependency model to extract the temporal dependencies across frames, and explicitly reassemble static visual relationships into dynamic scene graphs. Experimental results show that GTR achieves the state-of-the-art performance on Action Genome dataset. Further analyses reveal that the reassembling stage is crucial to the success of our framework.
Jiafeng Liang, Yuxin Wang 0002, Zekun Wang 0001, Ming Liu 0004, Ruiji Fu, Zhongyuan Wang 0006, Bing Qin 0001
IJCAI1