Jacob Levine

dblp:354/1391 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-2530-7690ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On Generating and Validating Erroneous Examples in CS1 Using LLMs
Chenyan Zhao, Jacob Levine, Kangyu Feng, Maxwell Fowler, Mariana Silva
AIED (3)3
2026 Automated Grading of Handwritten Mathematics Using Vision-Capable LLMs
Jacob Levine, Miguel Aenlle, Craig B. Zilles, Matthew West 0001, Mariana Silva
AIED1
2026 Correcting Transcripts: Student Interactions with VLM Graders
Jacob Levine, Mariana Silva
ITiCSE (2)1
2026 A Two-Stage LLM Pipeline for Handwritten Mathematics Autograding
abstract
While question-asking platforms have provided a wide array of pedagogical benefits and have decreased grader workload in university classes, they are limited in what types of inputs are accepted. Recent work has explored using Large Language Models to expand what can be automatically graded. In this study, we examine their use for grading handwritten mathematics questions via rubrics. Although much work remains, our preliminary results suggest that using separate prompts to first extract text and then evaluate rubric items enables LLMs to distinguish fully correct solutions from those requiring further review, thereby reducing grader workload.
Jacob Levine, Matthew West 0001, Mariana Silva
SIGCSE (2)1
2025 Contextualizing biological perturbation experiments through language
abstract
High-content perturbation experiments allow scientists to probe biomolecular systems at unprecedented resolution, but experimental and analysis costs pose significant barriers to widespread adoption. Machine learning has the potential to guide efficient exploration of the perturbation space and extract novel insights from these data. However, current approaches neglect the semantic richness of the relevant biology, and their objectives are misaligned with downstream biological analyses. In this paper, we hypothesize that large language models (LLMs) present a natural medium for representing complex biological relationships and rationalizing experimental outcomes. We propose PerturbQA, a benchmark for structured reasoning over perturbation experiments. Unlike current benchmarks that primarily interrogate existing knowledge, PerturbQA is inspired by open problems in perturbation modeling: prediction of differential expression and change of direction for unseen perturbations, and gene set enrichment. We evaluate state-of-the-art machine learning and statistical approaches for modeling perturbations, as well as standard LLM reasoning strategies, and we find that current methods perform poorly on PerturbQA. As a proof of feasibility, we introduce Summer (SUMMarize, retrievE, and answeR, a simple, domain-informed LLM framework that matches or exceeds the current state-of-the-art. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/genentech/PerturbQA.
Menghua Wu, Russell Littman, Jacob Levine, Tommaso Biancalani, David Richmond, Jan-Christian Hütter
ICLR3