Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities and have been extensively deployed across various domains, including recommender systems. Prior research has employed specialized prompts to leverage the in-context learning capabilities of LLMs for recommendation purposes. More recent studies have utilized instruction tuning techniques to align LLMs with human preferences, promising more effective recommendations. However, existing methods suffer from several limitations. The full potential of LLMs is not fully elicited due to low-quality tuning data and the overlooked integration of conventional recommender signals. Furthermore, LLMs may generate inconsistent responses for different ranking tasks in the recommendation, potentially leading to unreliable results. In this article, we introduce Ranker for top- k Recommendations (RecRanker), tailored for instruction tuning LLMs to serve as the Ranker for top- k Recommendations. Specifically, we introduce importance-aware sampling, clustering-based sampling, and penalty for repetitive sampling for sampling high-quality, representative, and diverse training data. To enhance the prompt, we introduce a position shifting strategy to mitigate position bias and augment the prompt with auxiliary information from conventional recommendation models, thereby enriching the contextual understanding of the LLM. Subsequently, we utilize the sampled data to assemble an instruction-tuning dataset with the augmented prompts comprising three distinct ranking tasks: pointwise, pairwise, and listwise rankings. We further propose a hybrid ranking method to enhance the model performance by ensembling these ranking tasks. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed RecRanker in both direct and sequential recommendation scenarios. 1

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) bring advantages such as comfort, safety, and eco-friendliness compared to conventional ones. The focus on comfort has become increasingly important as it plays a key role in the widespread acceptance of AVs. Passenger demand for alleviating motion sickness (MS) during travel has also driven extensive research in this area. This manuscript conducts a comprehensive and comparative review of published articles to provide up-to-date research outcomes on MS mitigation. It also examines the optimization methods employed over the past two decades to enhance motion comfort in AVs. The methods for detecting and resolving MS are elaborated upon, and the research gap and challenges are addressed. Furthermore, the manuscript presents the current efficacy of the research and proposes an anti-motion sickness control framework that utilizes a cloud control platform, which might offer potential future research directions in the field of autonomous driving. This study serves as a valuable reference for future efforts and opportunities to improve the motion comfort of AVs.

Abstract It is a critical quality assurance activity to effectively detect the root cause of faults causing the software crashes (i.e. crashing faults). Previous studies extracted features to characterise crash instances and built models to identify whether the residences of crashing faults locate inside the stack traces. These models all belong to supervised learning methods which require labelled crash data to be involved. In this study, the introduction of an unsupervised model, called T ransfer S pectral C lustering ( TSC ), for the task of crashing fault residence identification under the unlabelled data scenario is proposed. Unlike traditional unsupervised methods which are applied to individual project data, TSC transfers the knowledge of auxiliary unlabelled data from the source project to assist the clustering task on the unlabelled data from the target project. TSC is an unsupervised transfer learning method, and simultaneously considers the data manifold information of the individual project and feature manifold information across projects to facilitate the clustering effect. Extensive experiments are conducted on a benchmark dataset containing seven software projects. Five indicators were chosen for performance evaluation. The results show that TSC achieves better performance than four clustering based unsupervised methods, and competitive performance compared with eight supervised cross‐project methods.