Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonio Pedro Camargo

dblp:354/3570 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
1.922026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
CoverM: read alignment statistics for metagenomics · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › microbiology
virus-host interaction
1.012026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
DNA language model
0.912025
The OMG dataset: An Open MetaGenomic corpus for mixed-modality genomic language modeling · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein representation learning
0.312025
The OMG dataset: An Open MetaGenomic corpus for mixed-modality genomic language modeling · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence alignment · 1.0benchmarking · 1.0read alignment statistics · 0.9genomic language model · 0.9embedding-space deduplication · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection
abstract
MOTIVATION: CRISPR spacer-protospacer matching is widely used to infer host-virus interactions in microbial and viromics studies, but the choice of sequence search or alignment tool and its reporting behavior is often under-evaluated for this specific task. RESULTS: Using synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real datasets, we benchmarked commonly used tools and observed substantial differences in recall, runtime, and resource usage across distance metrics and thresholds. Our analyses support practical defaults for large-scale spacer-target matching and clarify trade-offs between exhaustive and heuristic approaches. AVAILABILITY: Source code and benchmark workflows are available at https://github.com/UriNeri/spacer_matching_bench. Data and run artifacts are archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15171878).
Uri Neri, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Brian Bushnell, Rick Beeloo, Simon Roux
Bioinform.2
2025 The OMG dataset: An Open MetaGenomic corpus for mixed-modality genomic language modeling
abstract
Biological language model performance depends heavily on pretraining data quality, diversity, and size. While metagenomic datasets feature enormous biological diversity, their utilization as pretraining data has been limited due to challenges in data accessibility, quality filtering and deduplication. Here, we present the Open MetaGenomic (OMG) corpus, a genomic pretraining dataset totalling 3.1T base pairs and 3.3B protein coding sequences, obtained by combining two largest metagenomic dataset repositories (JGI's IMG and EMBL's MGnify). We first document the composition of the dataset and describe the quality filtering steps taken to remove poor quality data. We make the OMG corpus available as a mixed-modality genomic sequence dataset that represents multi-gene encoding genomic sequences with translated amino acids for protein coding sequences, and nucleic acids for intergenic sequences. We train the first mixed-modality genomic language model (gLM2) that leverages genomic context information to learn robust functional representations, as well as coevolutionary signals in protein-protein interfaces and genomic regulatory syntax. Furthermore, we show that deduplication in embedding space can be used to balance the corpus, demonstrating improved performance on downstream tasks. The OMG dataset is publicly hosted on the Hugging Face Hub at https://huggingface.co/datasets/tattabio/OMG and gLM2 is available at https://huggingface.co/tattabio/gLM2_650M.
Andre Cornman, Jacob West-Roberts, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Simon Roux, Martin Beracochea, Milot Mirdita, Yunha Hwang
ICLR3
2025 CoverM: read alignment statistics for metagenomics
abstract
SUMMARY: Genome-centric analysis of metagenomic samples is a powerful method for understanding the function of microbial communities. Calculating read coverage is a central part of analysis, enabling differential coverage binning for recovery of genomes and estimation of microbial community composition. Coverage is determined by processing read alignments to reference sequences of either contigs or genomes. Per-reference coverage is typically calculated in an ad-hoc manner, with each software package providing its own implementation and specific definition of coverage. Here we present a unified software package CoverM which calculates several coverage statistics for contigs and genomes in an ergonomic and flexible manner. It uses "Mosdepth arrays" for computational efficiency and avoids unnecessary I/O overhead by calculating coverage statistics from streamed read alignment results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CoverM is free software available at https://github.com/wwood/coverm. CoverM is implemented in Rust, with Python (https://github.com/apcamargo/pycoverm) and Julia (https://github.com/JuliaBinaryWrappers/CoverM_jll.jl) interfaces.
Samuel T. N. Aroney, Rhys J. P. Newell, Jakob N. Nissen, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Gene W. Tyson, Ben J. Woodcroft
Bioinform.4